Nicolas Alvarez nous apporta ses lumieres en ce 2007/09/29 16:57:
> Alain escribió:
>> Le Forgeron nous apporta ses lumieres en ce 2007/09/26 11:41:
>>> Le 26.09.2007 15:17, Alain nous fit lire :
>>> does it mean we need no_transmission and no_refraction also ?
>>>
>  >
>> No. Just make no_image work coherently between versions, and according 
>> to the documentations.
>>
> 
> Why not? We could have no_image work coherently between versions and new 
> no_transmission and no_refraction keywords too ;-)
You could add those, yes, but you don't need to.
no_transmition would work relative to transparent objects that don't have an 
ior. You don't see the object through a transparent object, but will see it 
through one with an ior.
no_refraction would work for those that do have an ior. You see that through a 
transparent object but not if that object have any ior different than 1.

-- 
Alain
-------------------------------------------------
Idolism: Let's bronze this shit.

Post a reply to this message

Alain wrote:
> plane{z, 15 pigment{checker}finish{ambient 1} no_image}
> sphere{<0,0,3>,1 pigment{rgbt 1}}
> 
> It should be all black but you see the checker pigment through the sphere.

This is fixed in beta 26 (better late than never ;)

-- Chris

Post a reply to this message