 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>
> Are all entries form povray.bugreports verified with 3.5?
Most items from that group were fixed early on in Mega-Pov and those
that weren't were fixed in 3.5. There are a small number of bugs
reported from that group that were never fixed however. Such as this
bug reported by me and verified by Ron Parker -
Poly Object Bug
//----------------------------------------------
camera { location <0,0,-10> look_at 0 angle 25 }
light_source { <0,1,-100> color rgb 1 }
#declare Heart =
poly { 6,<
8.0,0,0,0,12,0,0,12,0,-12,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,6,0,0,12,0,-12,0,0,0,0,6,
-0.1,-12,0,6,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,3,0,-3,0,0,
0.0,0,3,-1,-6,0,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,-3,0,3,0,-1>
}
// sturm }
object { Heart rotate <-90,90,0> pigment { red 1 } }
//----------------------------------------------------
Personally I think Ron has conveniently forgotten about this one
because it is either impossible to fix or too difficult to fix :)
--
Ken Tyler
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Fri, 09 Nov 2001 06:42:20 -0800, Ken <tyl### [at] pacbell net> wrote:
> Personally I think Ron has conveniently forgotten about this one
> because it is either impossible to fix or too difficult to fix :)
So, should I spend the time and go trough povray.bugreports and check all
entries ?
ABX
--
#declare _=function(a,b,x){((a^2)+(b^2))^.5-x}#default {pigment{color rgb 1}}
union{plane{y,-3}plane{-x,-3}finish{reflection 1 ambient 0}}isosurface{ //ABX
function{_(x-2,y,1)|_((x+y)*.7,z,.1)|_((x+y+2)*.7,z,.1)|_(x/2+y*.8+1.5,z,.1)}
contained_by{box{<0,-3,-.1>,<3,0,.1>}}translate z*15finish{ambient 1}}//POV35
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
: So, should I spend the time and go trough povray.bugreports and check all
: entries ?
Would it make any harm?
--
#macro N(D,I)#if(I<6)cylinder{M()#local D[I]=div(D[I],104);M().5,2pigment{
rgb M()}}N(D,(D[I]>99?I:I+1))#end#end#macro M()<mod(D[I],13)-6,mod(div(D[I
],13),8)-3,10>#end blob{N(array[6]{11117333955,
7382340,3358,3900569407,970,4254934330},0)}// - Warp -
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 9 Nov 2001 09:56:46 -0500, Warp <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote:
> Would it make any harm?
I don't know rules of team - perhaps there is somebody who did it (perhaps
recently) and necessary not fixed entries are on the current bugfix list.
ABX
--
#declare _=function(a,b,x){((a^2)+(b^2))^.5-x}#default {pigment{color rgb 1}}
union{plane{y,-3}plane{-x,-3}finish{reflection 1 ambient 0}}isosurface{ //ABX
function{_(x-2,y,1)|_((x+y)*.7,z,.1)|_((x+y+2)*.7,z,.1)|_(x/2+y*.8+1.5,z,.1)}
contained_by{box{<0,-3,-.1>,<3,0,.1>}}translate z*15finish{ambient 1}}//POV35
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>
> On Fri, 09 Nov 2001 06:42:20 -0800, Ken <tyl### [at] pacbellnet> wrote:
>
> > Personally I think Ron has conveniently forgotten about this one
> > because it is either impossible to fix or too difficult to fix :)
>
> So, should I spend the time and go trough povray.bugreports and check all
> entries ?
During alpha testing I went through and double checked most of the
bug reports in that group. I started from the oldest and worked
towards the newest. I did not finish going through all of them. If
you want to, try going through the newest 1/3 of the bug reports
and verify if they have been fixed of not. The rest have been
checked and have been fixed or reported or both.
--
Ken Tyler
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Fri, 09 Nov 2001 07:06:50 -0800, Ken <tyl### [at] pacbellnet> wrote:
>If you want to, try going through the newest 1/3 of the bug reports
>and verify if they have been fixed of not.
I do it!
ABX
--
#declare _=function(a,b,x){((a^2)+(b^2))^.5-x}#default {pigment{color rgb 1}}
union{plane{y,-3}plane{-x,-3}finish{reflection 1 ambient 0}}isosurface{ //ABX
function{_(x-2,y,1)|_((x+y)*.7,z,.1)|_((x+y+2)*.7,z,.1)|_(x/2+y*.8+1.5,z,.1)}
contained_by{box{<0,-3,-.1>,<3,0,.1>}}translate z*15finish{ambient 1}}//POV35
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Fri, 09 Nov 2001 06:42:20 -0800, Ken <tyl### [at] pacbellnet> wrote:
> #declare Heart =
If the poly creates the same equation (I've not checked) like heart available in
isosurface library then it could be something strange with equation or solver.
Iso version of heart has also strange line in the middle.
ABX
--
#declare _=function(a,b,x){((a^2)+(b^2))^.5-x}#default {pigment{color rgb 1}}
union{plane{y,-3}plane{-x,-3}finish{reflection 1 ambient 0}}isosurface{ //ABX
function{_(x-2,y,1)|_((x+y)*.7,z,.1)|_((x+y+2)*.7,z,.1)|_(x/2+y*.8+1.5,z,.1)}
contained_by{box{<0,-3,-.1>,<3,0,.1>}}translate z*15finish{ambient 1}}//POV35
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
: Iso version of heart has also strange line in the middle.
Sounds like an undefined location (most probably the 1/0 case).
--
#macro N(D,I)#if(I<6)cylinder{M()#local D[I]=div(D[I],104);M().5,2pigment{
rgb M()}}N(D,(D[I]>99?I:I+1))#end#end#macro M()<mod(D[I],13)-6,mod(div(D[I
],13),8)-3,10>#end blob{N(array[6]{11117333955,
7382340,3358,3900569407,970,4254934330},0)}// - Warp -
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Fri, 09 Nov 2001 06:42:20 -0800, Ken wrote:
>
>
>>
>> Are all entries form povray.bugreports verified with 3.5?
>
> Most items from that group were fixed early on in Mega-Pov and those
> that weren't were fixed in 3.5. There are a small number of bugs
> reported from that group that were never fixed however. Such as this
> bug reported by me and verified by Ron Parker -
[...]
> Personally I think Ron has conveniently forgotten about this one
> because it is either impossible to fix or too difficult to fix :)
Actually it's in the jobs database but marked as suspended. I wasn't
able to figure out what it was, but it looked like a precision problem
to me. It might get fixed someday, but not today.
--
plane{-z,-3normal{crackle scale.2#local a=5;#while(a)warp{repeat x flip x}rotate
z*60#local a=a-1;#end translate-9*x}pigment{rgb 1}}light_source{-9red 1rotate 60
*z}light_source{-9rgb y rotate-z*60}light_source{9-z*18rgb z}text{ttf"arial.ttf"
"RP".01,0translate-<.6,.4,.02>pigment{bozo}}light_source{-z*3rgb-.2}//Ron Parker
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Ron Parker wrote:
> Actually it's in the jobs database but marked as suspended. I wasn't
> able to figure out what it was, but it looked like a precision problem
> to me. It might get fixed someday, but not today.
A lot of people are going to be brokenhearted over this.
--
Ken Tyler
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
