|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
The second #local statement in the code below will not parse in Windows
beta 11 even though the doucmentation says that splines will work "wherever
you would normally put a vector." This behavior seems to be a holdover
from Megapov. Assuming Pov can't be fixed, a note in the documentation
that the Megapov spline workaround (i.e. 1*spline(etc)) must be used might
be a good idea.
#local mTrack = spline {linear_spline 0, <0,0,0> 1, <12,0,12>}
#local P0 = mTrack(C);
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
In article <Xns### [at] 204213191226> , che### [at] sympaticoca
(Coridon Henshaw) wrote:
> The second #local statement in the code below will not parse in Windows
> beta 11 even though the doucmentation says that splines will work "wherever
> you would normally put a vector." This behavior seems to be a holdover
> from Megapov. Assuming Pov can't be fixed, a note in the documentation
> that the Megapov spline workaround (i.e. 1*spline(etc)) must be used might
> be a good idea.
Works correctly and has been explained before.
Thorsten
____________________________________________________
Thorsten Froehlich, Duisburg, Germany
e-mail: tho### [at] trfde
Visit POV-Ray on the web: http://mac.povray.org
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Thorsten Froehlich" <tho### [at] trfde> wrote in
news:3c6790c6@news.povray.org:
>> Assuming Pov can't be fixed, a note in the documentation that the
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>> Megapov spline workaround (i.e. 1*spline(etc)) must be used might be a
>> good idea.
> Works correctly
Then, as I said, the behavior needs to be documented as the existing
documentation provides a misleading example and makes no mention of this
obviously correct behavior.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
In article <Xns### [at] 204213191226> , che### [at] sympaticoca
(Coridon Henshaw) wrote:
>>> Assuming Pov can't be fixed, a note in the documentation that the
>>> Megapov spline workaround (i.e. 1*spline(etc)) must be used might be a
>>> good idea.
>
>> Works correctly
>
> Then, as I said, the behavior needs to be documented as the existing
> documentation provides a misleading example and makes no mention of this
> obviously correct behavior.
BTW, a sufficient change to the scene is to place the expression into
parenthesis.
Thorsten
____________________________________________________
Thorsten Froehlich, Duisburg, Germany
e-mail: tho### [at] trfde
Visit POV-Ray on the web: http://mac.povray.org
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |