 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Info: WinNT4, PII 233, 128MB, POV3.5b1
Cursor is at position 1
I write two letters - "am" - cursor at position 3
I press TAB - "ambient" word appear - cursor at position 8
I press Ctrl-Z to undo expansion but cursor stayed at position 8
I think it should be at 3
ABX
--
// let's start with alfa signature for beta
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
<abx### [at] babilon org> wrote:
>Info: WinNT4, PII 233, 128MB, POV3.5b1
sorry but POV3.5b2
ABX
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Chris Cason
Subject: Re: bug with undo after keyword expansion
Date: 18 Sep 2001 12:00:46
Message: <3ba76fae@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> I think it should be at 3
Actually, I think you should read the docs on keyword expansion, especially
if you are going to report a bug in it.
-- Chris
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Wed, 19 Sep 2001 02:00:07 +1000, "Chris Cason"
<newsadmin@-despam-povray.org> wrote:
> > I think it should be at 3
>
> Actually, I think you should read the docs on keyword expansion, especially
> if you are going to report a bug in it.
sorry then
words "it won't always restore the caret position" means that it is a
bug but of course known one, right ?
personally I don't like two combination for different undos
I think "Hint" should be replaced with "Warning" in 1.5.5.2
ABX
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Chris Cason
Subject: Re: bug with undo after keyword expansion
Date: 19 Sep 2001 09:20:01
Message: <3ba89b81@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> words "it won't always restore the caret position" means that it is a
> bug but of course known one, right ?
no, if it were a bug I would have fixed it. what it means is that if you
want to return to the previous state, use shift+tab, rather than undo. this
is the 'official' way to do it. if enough people complain then I may change
my position on this.
-- Chris
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Wed, 19 Sep 2001 19:09:56 +1000, "Chris Cason"
<newsadmin@-despam-povray.org> wrote:
> > words "it won't always restore the caret position" means that it is a
> > bug but of course known one, right ?
>
> no, if it were a bug I would have fixed it
perhaps it my english but I thought becouse of sentence "won't always"
which means for me "somtimes yes, sometimes no" and IMO if something
is not stable then it is a bug, but as I said this could be my english
recognition
> what it means is that if you
> want to return to the previous state, use shift+tab, rather than undo. this
> is the 'official' way to do it. if enough people complain then I may change
> my position on this.
well, now I have tested four programs, some from MSC and some from
Borland Delphi, and every one makes keyword expansion with normal undo
ABX
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
