 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
hi,
William F Pokorny <ano### [at] anonymous org> wrote:
> The #declare / #local, deprecated sub-feature does not function when the
> reference to the identifiers is done via the 'global' and 'local' pseudo
> dictionaries(*).
> ...
> (*) As mentioned in an earlier post to beta-test, I don't presently
> recommend any pseudo dictionary use in v3.8 beyond the #macro local.
> testing for optional parameter defaults.
for instance, if I have 'A.pov' and 'A.inc', and the latter '#include's another
file ('filed.inc', in this particular situation), I have taken to writing in
'A.inc' eg:
#ifdef (global.fild_workingDir)
...
#end
would dropping the 'global' make an actual difference ?
regards, jr.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: William F Pokorny
Subject: Re: v3.8 b2. Deprecated feature doesn't work with pseudo dictionaries
Date: 23 Oct 2023 09:43:48
Message: <65367894$1@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 10/22/23 15:39, jr wrote:
> would dropping the 'global' make an actual difference ?
Sure. Whether the difference matters depends on - stuff.
(Above a MUCH shorter response than I tried to send a while ago from
thunderbird. A response sitting in my sent folder, but thus far it has
not shown up elsewhere? I this doesn't work, I'll ping you via email
directly)
Bill P.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: William F Pokorny
Subject: Re: v3.8 b2. Deprecated feature doesn't work with pseudo dictionaries
Date: 23 Oct 2023 09:59:00
Message: <65367c24$1@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 10/23/23 09:43, William F Pokorny wrote:
> On 10/22/23 15:39, jr wrote:
>> would dropping the 'global' make an actual difference ?
>
> Sure. Whether the difference matters depends on - stuff.
>
> (Above a MUCH shorter response than I tried to send a while ago from
> thunderbird. A response sitting in my sent folder, but thus far it has
> not shown up elsewhere? I this doesn't work, I'll ping you via email
> directly)
>
> Bill P.
That showed up and I tried again to send my long response. It again is
in my sent folder, but otherwise again went poof... :-(
Suppose beyond my thinking while writing it, my ramblings don't rate
much for general value in any case.
I'm going to work on other stuff for a while. :-)
Bill P.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Chris Cason
Subject: Re: v3.8 b2. Deprecated feature doesn't work with pseudo dictionaries
Date: 24 Oct 2023 00:25:44
Message: <65374748@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 24/10/2023 00:59, William F Pokorny wrote:
> That showed up and I tried again to send my long response. It again is in my sent
folder, but otherwise again went poof... :-(
The spam filter ate it (and the previous). I'll try to work out what's triggering it
and either remove that factor or find a way to exempt your posts.
-- Chris
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: William F Pokorny
Subject: Re: v3.8 b2. Deprecated feature doesn't work with pseudo dictionaries
Date: 24 Oct 2023 07:03:28
Message: <6537a480$1@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 10/24/23 00:25, Chris Cason wrote:
> On 24/10/2023 00:59, William F Pokorny wrote:
>> That showed up and I tried again to send my long response. It again is
>> in my sent folder, but otherwise again went poof... :-(
>
> The spam filter ate it (and the previous). I'll try to work out what's
> triggering it and either remove that factor or find a way to exempt your
> posts.
>
> -- Chris
>
Thank you Chris.
Bill P.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: William F Pokorny
Subject: Re: v3.8 b2. Deprecated feature doesn't work with pseudo dictionaries
Date: 25 Oct 2023 08:53:20
Message: <65390fc0$1@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 10/24/23 00:25, Chris Cason wrote:
> On 24/10/2023 00:59, William F Pokorny wrote:
>> That showed up and I tried again to send my long response. It again is
>> in my sent folder, but otherwise again went poof... :-(
>
> The spam filter ate it (and the previous). I'll try to work out what's
> triggering it and either remove that factor or find a way to exempt your
> posts.
>
> -- Chris
>
I had the thought maybe my glitching head had dropped a 'bad word' into
my rejected post. I carefully read what I'd sent again, but it all
looked innocuous.
Made some coffee, took a few sips, and I thought to search on my
playpen's fork name. Dang, a gazillion adult sites pop up. When I picked
that name I saw only a few unimportant collisions on searching the web.
Well _____(a). I guess, moving to another fork name is now at the top of
my to do list no matter the reason the spam filter tripped. What a pain.
Something obscure, z_4_ ?
Except, jr, wouldn't like having to use the shift key...
Bill P.
(a) - That was a bad word.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Don’t worry about renaming it yet, I need to run it through the spam filter
manually and find what specifically is tripping it up. Will do that today.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: William F Pokorny
Subject: Re: v3.8 b2. Deprecated feature doesn't work with pseudo dictionaries
Date: 28 Oct 2023 07:04:18
Message: <653ceab2@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 10/25/23 09:30, Chris Cason wrote:
> Don’t worry about renaming it yet, I need to run it through the spam filter
> manually and find what specifically is tripping it up. Will do that today.
>
Chris,
FYI. I've started the work to rename the fork. I want to get away from
from the adult site name in any case.
Once done, I'll try a post to povray.test of the original text, except
with my new fork name. If it still gets rejected, I can find the issue
myself with repeated posts to p.test. You can take this work item off
your plate - except for any eventual spam filter update, should one
still be needed.
Bill P.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Chris Cason
Subject: Re: v3.8 b2. Deprecated feature doesn't work with pseudo dictionaries
Date: 29 Oct 2023 01:04:33
Message: <653de7e1$1@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 28/10/2023 22:04, William F Pokorny wrote:
> On 10/25/23 09:30, Chris Cason wrote:
>> Don’t worry about renaming it yet, I need to run it through the spam filter
>> manually and find what specifically is tripping it up. Will do that today.
>>
>
> Chris,
>
> FYI. I've started the work to rename the fork. I want to get away from from the
adult site name in any case.
>
> Once done, I'll try a post to povray.test of the original text, except with my new
fork name. If it still gets rejected, I can find the issue myself with repeated posts
to p.test. You can take this work item off your plate - except for any eventual spam
filter update, should one still be needed.
ok. sorry didn't get to fix it, I've been clobbered with a particularly nasty variant
of the flu going around Australia right now. normally only takes me a few days to get
over a flu, approaching 10 days now.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: William F Pokorny
Subject: Re: v3.8 b2. Deprecated feature doesn't work with pseudo dictionaries
Date: 30 Oct 2023 14:33:12
Message: <653ff6e8$1@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 10/29/23 01:04, Chris Cason wrote:
> ok. sorry didn't get to fix it, I've been clobbered with a particularly
> nasty variant of the flu going around Australia right now. normally only
> takes me a few days to get over a flu, approaching 10 days now.
I hope you're feeling better.
It was not my older fork name and I had not much luck in isolating the
cause for the spam rejection.
It seems to be some longer span 'rejection rule match'.
See the rejected posts to povray.test with the Fourteenth (and
Fifteenth) runs at the spam filter for the smallest posts I managed
still getting rejected. Both about half the size of the original.
Get well. No rush.
Bill P.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
