POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.beta-test : bezier.pov Server Time
28 Mar 2024 20:05:37 EDT (-0400)
  bezier.pov (Message 17 to 26 of 26)  
<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Initial 10 Messages
From: clipka
Subject: Re: bezier.pov
Date: 6 Mar 2016 01:20:03
Message: <web.56db04ff8ece4badc77518d0@news.povray.org>
Le_Forgeron <jgr### [at] freefr> wrote:

> Even a bigger hammer: if I use memset with a value of 0xFF (instead of 0), I get a
100% background image.
> Reliably.

That did the trick.
Found the culprit and about to submit a fix any moment now.


Post a reply to this message

From: clipka
Subject: Re: bezier.pov
Date: 6 Mar 2016 01:20:03
Message: <web.56db0b418ece4badc77518d0@news.povray.org>
ThH <no.spam@address> wrote:
> I don't see a bicubic_patch 8[

Please test the newest master.


Post a reply to this message

From: Le Forgeron
Subject: Re: bezier.pov
Date: 6 Mar 2016 03:18:01
Message: <56dbe7b9$1@news.povray.org>
Le 05/03/2016 17:37, clipka a écrit :
> ThH <no.spam@address> wrote:
>> I don't see a bicubic_patch 8[
> 
> Please test the newest master.
> 

POV-Ray 3.7.1-alpha.8508492.unofficial seems ok, at least for valgrind (but I was only
getting small artefacts, randomly)


Post a reply to this message

From: ThH
Subject: Re: bezier.pov
Date: 6 Mar 2016 03:19:15
Message: <56dbe803$1@news.povray.org>
Good to be back on news.povray.org:119 !

Am 05.03.2016 um 17:37 schrieb clipka:

> Please test the newest master.

Bezier is fine now. Thanks clipka :))

--
Thorsten aka ThH
povray --V
POV-Ray 3.7.1-alpha.8508492.unofficial


Post a reply to this message

From: clipka
Subject: Re: bezier.pov
Date: 6 Mar 2016 03:25:11
Message: <56dbe967$1@news.povray.org>
Am 06.03.2016 um 09:18 schrieb Le_Forgeron:
> Le 05/03/2016 17:37, clipka a écrit :
>> ThH <no.spam@address> wrote:
>>> I don't see a bicubic_patch 8[
>>
>> Please test the newest master.
> 
> POV-Ray 3.7.1-alpha.8508492.unofficial seems ok, at least for valgrind (but I was
only getting small artefacts, randomly)

Does it also affect the Leak Summary?


Post a reply to this message

From: ThH
Subject: Re: bezier.pov
Date: 6 Mar 2016 03:31:19
Message: <56dbead7$1@news.povray.org>
Am 06.03.2016 um 09:20 schrieb ThH:

> Bezier is fine now. Thanks clipka :))

bezier.pov shows some artefacts.

flatness seems to have some influence on this. Lower flatness, less/no 
artefacts.

Just to let you know ;)


Post a reply to this message

From: Le Forgeron
Subject: Re: bezier.pov
Date: 6 Mar 2016 03:42:12
Message: <56dbed64@news.povray.org>
Le 06/03/2016 09:25, clipka a écrit :
> Am 06.03.2016 um 09:18 schrieb Le_Forgeron:
>> Le 05/03/2016 17:37, clipka a écrit :
>>> ThH <no.spam@address> wrote:
>>>> I don't see a bicubic_patch 8[
>>>
>>> Please test the newest master.
>>
>> POV-Ray 3.7.1-alpha.8508492.unofficial seems ok, at least for valgrind (but I was
only getting small artefacts, randomly)
> 
> Does it also affect the Leak Summary?
> 
If you want more details about the leak, attached file was done with:

valgrind --log-file=memcheckpovray2.txt --track-origins=yes --leak-check=full dmpovray
bezier.pov


Post a reply to this message


Attachments:
Download 'memcheckpovray2.txt' (24 KB)

From: clipka
Subject: Re: bezier.pov
Date: 6 Mar 2016 03:46:10
Message: <56dbee52$1@news.povray.org>
Am 06.03.2016 um 09:32 schrieb ThH:

> bezier.pov shows some artefacts.
> 
> flatness seems to have some influence on this. Lower flatness, less/no
> artefacts.

Thin lines?

They're normal, and the flatness parameter is indeed the setting to
counteract them.


Post a reply to this message

From: Le Forgeron
Subject: Re: bezier.pov
Date: 6 Mar 2016 03:47:35
Message: <56dbeea7$1@news.povray.org>
Le 06/03/2016 09:42, Le_Forgeron a écrit :
> Le 06/03/2016 09:25, clipka a écrit :
>> Am 06.03.2016 um 09:18 schrieb Le_Forgeron:
>>> Le 05/03/2016 17:37, clipka a écrit :
>>>> ThH <no.spam@address> wrote:
>>>>> I don't see a bicubic_patch 8[
>>>>
>>>> Please test the newest master.
>>>
>>> POV-Ray 3.7.1-alpha.8508492.unofficial seems ok, at least for valgrind (but I was
only getting small artefacts, randomly)
>>
>> Does it also affect the Leak Summary?
>>
> If you want more details about the leak, attached file was done with:
> 
> valgrind --log-file=memcheckpovray2.txt --track-origins=yes --leak-check=full
dmpovray bezier.pov
> 
And to compare with the stable head, another attached file.

It was less leaking before :-)


Post a reply to this message


Attachments:
Download 'memcheckpovray.txt' (6 KB)

From: ThH
Subject: Re: bezier.pov
Date: 6 Mar 2016 04:09:43
Message: <56dbf3d7$1@news.povray.org>
Am 06.03.2016 um 09:46 schrieb clipka:

> Thin lines?

Yes.

> They're normal, and the flatness parameter is indeed the setting to
> counteract them.

Looked up the docs. That's why I tried this ;)

To be honest... I've never used bicubic_patch before.

For me the image is fine :)

The 'rest' is yours.

Only citing valgrind here: Go fix your program! ;))


Post a reply to this message

<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Initial 10 Messages

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.