 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 23-2-2016 16:49, clipka wrote:
> Am 23.02.2016 um 10:33 schrieb ThH:
>
>> *** Error in `povray': double free or corruption (out):
>> 0x00007fe1e40efc30 ***
>> Abgebrochen
>>
>> Is it just me, my system or... is there really something that needs to
>> be changed?
>
> I can confirm that as a genuine bug.
>
> Please test whether 3.7.1-alpha.8492620 fixes the issue for you.
>
No windows version? I only see source codes.
--
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 24-2-2016 8:56, Thomas de Groot wrote:
> No windows version? I only see source codes.
>
Forget that. I was looking in the wrong folder...
--
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Yes, sure, you are VERY RIGHT to report any bug here to CLipka. Trust
me, you do us a big favor. Thanks for helping us to improve POV-Ray. The
more bugs can be found, the better. We need a functioning POV-Ray.
Not only me, but also CLipka is thankful for your help.
:-)
On 23.02.2016 04:33, ThH wrote:
> Hallo to all and a big "Thank you" to the developers :))
>
> Hope this the right place to report this...
>
> Rendering some of the examples I found this:
>
> thh@quadro:~$ cd '/home/thh/POV_Master/share/povray-3.7/scenes/advanced'
> thh@quadro:~/POV_Master/share/povray-3.7/scenes/advanced$ povray
> abyss.pov +p -w320 -h120
> Persistence of Vision(tm) Ray Tracer Version
> 3.7.1-alpha.8463913.unofficial (g++
> 4.9.2 @ x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
> This is an unofficial version compiled by:
> ThH <no.spam@address>
> The POV-Ray Team is not responsible for supporting this version.
>
> <snip>
>
> ==== [Parsing...]
> ==========================================================
> *** Error in `povray': double free or corruption (out):
> 0x00007fe1e40efc30 ***
> Abgebrochen
>
> Is it just me, my system or... is there really something that needs to
> be changed?
>
> I would be happy to provide additional informations if necessary.
>
> Thorsten aka ThH
> No... I'm not a native speaker.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Am 27.02.2016 um 07:34 schrieb Sven Littkowski:
> Yes, sure, you are VERY RIGHT to report any bug here to CLipka. Trust
> me, you do us a big favor. Thanks for helping us to improve POV-Ray. The
> more bugs can be found, the better. We need a functioning POV-Ray.
>
> Not only me, but also CLipka is thankful for your help.
> :-)
Fine :)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Am 27.02.2016 um 07:34 schrieb Sven Littkowski:
> Yes, sure, you are VERY RIGHT to report any bug here to CLipka. Trust
> me, you do us a big favor. Thanks for helping us to improve POV-Ray. The
> more bugs can be found, the better. We need a functioning POV-Ray.
>
> Not only me, but also CLipka is thankful for your help.
> :-)
Well, as a matter of fact he is -- provided the reports are indeed about
bugs, and not about something you entirely misunderstood or stuff like
that ;)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Hmmm, yes...
On 27.02.2016 03:16, clipka wrote:
> Well, as a matter of fact he is -- provided the reports are indeed about
> bugs, and not about something you entirely misunderstood or stuff like
> that ;)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
