POV-Ray: Newsgroups: povray.beta-test: Different radiosity in 3.6?

POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.beta-test : Different radiosity in 3.6?		Server Time 1 Nov 2024 05:22:19 EDT (-0400)

From: Severi Salminen
Subject: Different radiosity in 3.6?
Date: 3 Feb 2004 08:05:01
Message: <401f9c7d$1@news.povray.org>

It looks like the new 3.6 Beta produces slightly different image (when 
comparing pixel values) than 3.5 when using radiosity. Is this expected 
and intentional?

Severi Salminen

Post a reply to this message

From: Warp
Subject: Re: Different radiosity in 3.6?
Date: 3 Feb 2004 08:27:51
Message: <401fa1d7@news.povray.org>

Severi Salminen <sev### [at] not_thissibafi> wrote:
> It looks like the new 3.6 Beta produces slightly different image (when 
> comparing pixel values) than 3.5 when using radiosity. Is this expected 
> and intentional?

  AFAIK, yes.

  I think that a easy-to-read list of changes is in the works, so it will
probably include some info about this as well.

-- 
#macro M(A,N,D,L)plane{-z,-9pigment{mandel L*9translate N color_map{[0rgb x]
[1rgb 9]}scale<D,D*3D>*1e3}rotate y*A*8}#end M(-3<1.206434.28623>70,7)M(
-1<.7438.1795>1,20)M(1<.77595.13699>30,20)M(3<.75923.07145>80,99)// - Warp -

Post a reply to this message

From: Severi Salminen
Subject: Re: Different radiosity in 3.6?
Date: 3 Feb 2004 08:39:19
Message: <401fa487$1@news.povray.org>

Warp wrote:

> Severi Salminen <sev### [at] not_thissibafi> wrote:
> 
>>It looks like the new 3.6 Beta produces slightly different image (when 
>>comparing pixel values) than 3.5 when using radiosity. Is this expected 
>>and intentional?
> 
> 
>   AFAIK, yes.
> 
>   I think that a easy-to-read list of changes is in the works, so it will
> probably include some info about this as well.
> 

Ok, I'll look forward for that. Thanks.

Severi S.

Post a reply to this message