POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.beta-test : Is ambient not right? Server Time
1 Nov 2024 16:35:57 EDT (-0400)
  Is ambient not right? (Message 1 to 4 of 4)  
From: cadman
Subject: Is ambient not right?
Date: 20 Feb 2002 15:47:01
Message: <3c740b45$1@news.povray.org>
I posted the pic in p.b.i.:

Forgive my grammar, I'm not quite sure how else to word it...
Shouldn't there not be shadows on the plane?  And shouldn't the background
be flat grey (no light attenuation)?

#include "colors.inc"   // Standard Color definitions
#include "golds.inc"

light_source {
  <0,2,-1>*8
  color White
}

sphere {
 0, 20
 texture {
  pigment { rgb 0.5 }
  finish { ambient 1.0 }
 }
 hollow
}

plane {
 y, 0
 texture {
  pigment { rgb 0.5 }
  finish { ambient 1.0 }
 }
}

#default {
 texture { T_Gold_5A }
}

sphere {
 y*1, 1
}

camera {
 location <3, 3, -3>*0.7
 look_at y*1
}


Post a reply to this message

From: Christoph Hormann
Subject: Re: Is ambient not right?
Date: 20 Feb 2002 16:13:05
Message: <3C74111C.22B8B863@gmx.de>
cadman wrote:
> 
> I posted the pic in p.b.i.:
> 
> Forgive my grammar, I'm not quite sure how else to word it...
> Shouldn't there not be shadows on the plane?  And shouldn't the background
> be flat grey (no light attenuation)?
> 

There are shadows since the diffuse finish is the default value of 0.6 and
the background is not plain flat since the angle towards the light source
changes and therefore the brightness (also due to the diffuse finish).

This all has nothing to do with 3.5 beta of course.

Christoph

-- 
POV-Ray tutorials, IsoWood include,                 
TransSkin and more: http://www.tu-bs.de/~y0013390/  
Last updated 06 Feb. 2002 _____./\/^>_*_<^\/\.______


Post a reply to this message

From: cadman
Subject: Re: Is ambient not right?
Date: 20 Feb 2002 16:33:32
Message: <3c74162c$1@news.povray.org>
My apologies for the wrong group posting.  I had been able to create a flat
colored planes in previous versions (or think I remember doing that).  Thank
you for humoring me.

"Christoph Hormann" <chr### [at] gmxde> wrote in message
news:3C74111C.22B8B863@gmx.de...
>
>
> cadman wrote:
> >
> > I posted the pic in p.b.i.:
> >
> > Forgive my grammar, I'm not quite sure how else to word it...
> > Shouldn't there not be shadows on the plane?  And shouldn't the
background
> > be flat grey (no light attenuation)?
> >
>
> There are shadows since the diffuse finish is the default value of 0.6 and
> the background is not plain flat since the angle towards the light source
> changes and therefore the brightness (also due to the diffuse finish).
>
> This all has nothing to do with 3.5 beta of course.
>
> Christoph
>
> --
> POV-Ray tutorials, IsoWood include,
> TransSkin and more: http://www.tu-bs.de/~y0013390/
> Last updated 06 Feb. 2002 _____./\/^>_*_<^\/\.______


Post a reply to this message

From: Peter Popov
Subject: Re: Is ambient not right?
Date: 20 Feb 2002 18:09:32
Message: <qra87uovnu1000kd0jfmj26u4s02p3r33m@4ax.com>
On Wed, 20 Feb 2002 16:33:33 -0500, "cadman" <cad### [at] graffitinet>
wrote:

>My apologies for the wrong group posting.  I had been able to create a flat
>colored planes in previous versions (or think I remember doing that).  Thank
>you for humoring me.

Just add a diffuse 0 in your finish statement and you'll get no
shadows.


Peter Popov ICQ : 15002700
Personal e-mail : pet### [at] vipbg
TAG      e-mail : pet### [at] tagpovrayorg


Post a reply to this message

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.