[doc] photons pass_through and no_shadow (Message 1 to 3 of 3)
From: Philippe Debar
Subject: [doc] photons pass_through and no_shadow
Date: 17 Oct 2001 18:20:15
Message: <3bce041f@news.povray.org>
This is confusing me...
In "6.10.2.2 Shooting Photons at an Object"
"If you use the no_shadow keyword, the object will be tagged as pass_through
automatically."
vs.
In "6.10.5 Photons FAQ"
"Note that photons ignore the no_shadow keyword. You should use photons {
pass_through } if you want photons to pass through objects unaffected."
is this correct ?
Confusedly
Philippe
From: Philippe Debar
Subject: Re: [doc] photons pass_through and no_shadow
Date: 12 Jul 2002 18:24:25
Message: <3d2f5719@news.povray.org>
This contradiction is still there... Am I misunderstanding something ?
"Philippe Debar" <phd### [at] belgacomnet> wrote in message
news:3bce041f@news.povray.org...
> This is confusing me...>> In "6.10.2.2 Shooting Photons at an Object"> "If you use the no_shadow keyword, the object will be tagged as
pass_through
> automatically.">> vs.>> In "6.10.5 Photons FAQ"> "Note that photons ignore the no_shadow keyword. You should use photons {> pass_through } if you want photons to pass through objects unaffected.">>> is this correct ?>>>> Confusedly>> Philippe>>>>
From: Nathan Kopp
Subject: Re: [doc] photons pass_through and no_shadow
Date: 13 Jul 2002 00:18:52
Message: <3d2faa2c$1@news.povray.org>
Hmmm... test it and see what happens. My guess is that 5.10.2.2 is a new
functionality that we added, because much of what is in 6.10.5 is OLD photon
FAQ from UV-Pov (even before MegaPov). Some of the FAQ was updated, but
some apparantly was not.
-Nathan
"Philippe Debar" <phd### [at] wanadoobe> wrote...
> This contradiction is still there... Am I misunderstanding something ?>> "Philippe Debar" <phd### [at] belgacomnet> wrote in message> news:3bce041f@news.povray.org...> > This is confusing me...> >> > In "6.10.2.2 Shooting Photons at an Object"> > "If you use the no_shadow keyword, the object will be tagged as> pass_through> > automatically."> >> > vs.> >> > In "6.10.5 Photons FAQ"> > "Note that photons ignore the no_shadow keyword. You should use photons
{
> > pass_through } if you want photons to pass through objects unaffected."> >> >> > is this correct ?> >> >> >> > Confusedly> >> > Philippe> >> >> >> >>>