 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Rick Gutleber
Subject: small but annoying documentation bug... also blob sample
Date: 25 Sep 2001 09:16:22
Message: <3bb083a6@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
The plural of "axis" is "axes", not "axii".
More importantly, and I haven't seen this mentioned, but please forgive me
if I missed it, there is a really obvious problem with the scenes\objects
directory, blob.pov renders with two small black triangles on the blob next
to the circular inner hole. I can't imagine it was missed, but I was
curious what the status of that issue was.
Rick
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Bob H
Subject: Re: small but annoying documentation bug... also blob sample
Date: 26 Sep 2001 06:31:11
Message: <3bb1ae6f@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Rick Gutleber" <ric### [at] his com> wrote in message
news:3bb083a6@news.povray.org...
> The plural of "axis" is "axes", not "axii".
>
> More importantly, and I haven't seen this mentioned, but please forgive me
> if I missed it, there is a really obvious problem with the scenes\objects
> directory, blob.pov renders with two small black triangles on the blob
next
> to the circular inner hole. I can't imagine it was missed, but I was
> curious what the status of that issue was.
Gee, the old syntax too. When I rendered all the scenes it was only at
320x240 maximum and I can't notice that speck here until at 512x384. Not to
mention I only scanned through each.
sturmian root solver is no good for it either. blob has been one of those
difficult primitives so I guess no one has a answer yet.
Bob H.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Bob H." wrote:
>
> "Rick Gutleber" <ric### [at] hiscom> wrote in message
> news:3bb083a6@news.povray.org...
> > The plural of "axis" is "axes", not "axii".
> >
> > More importantly, and I haven't seen this mentioned, but please forgive me
> > if I missed it, there is a really obvious problem with the scenes\objects
> > directory, blob.pov renders with two small black triangles on the blob
> next
> > to the circular inner hole. I can't imagine it was missed, but I was
> > curious what the status of that issue was.
>
> Gee, the old syntax too. When I rendered all the scenes it was only at
> 320x240 maximum and I can't notice that speck here until at 512x384. Not to
> mention I only scanned through each.
> sturmian root solver is no good for it either. blob has been one of those
> difficult primitives so I guess no one has a answer yet.
>
> Bob H.
Sorry, BUT, I have(*) the beginning of the answer for that particular blob
problem.
See "Blob: Toward a solution" in this group, posted about the 7 September.
Have a nice day.
--
*: Well, modesty should make me write that "I believe that I have"...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
