|
|
I have encountered a strange phenomenon in Beta 8. I went to include a
file in a scene, and received an "Object or directive expected but {
found" error on the camera bracket when I called my object. I went back
to the include file that declares several unions, and found that the
first three unions work fine, and then the error occurs. If I call the
final object *without* curly braces, it works, which should not occur.
Calling the object in this way in the scene file generates the error. I
tried the scene in MegaPOV 7 and it runs perfectly, and there are no
version-specific elements to the code, so I don't think it has anything
to do with the syntax. Has anyone else had this problem?
Athlon 1G with 640M, Win ME
Post a reply to this message
|
|
|
|
Dave Dunn wrote:
> >I have encountered a strange phenomenon in Beta 8. I went to include a
> >file in a scene, and received an "Object or directive expected but {
> >found" error on the camera bracket when I called my object.
Well, I found the source of the problem but the answer is equally puzzling.
The problem was caused by a missing # before a declare in the include file.
All previous versions of POV-Ray have issued a warning but still rendered.
It seems that 3.5 generates an error that is not explicitly related to the
missing #.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
|
|
In article <3C14FE2D.D070D954@aol.com> , Dave Dunn <poi### [at] aolcom>
wrote:
> Well, I found the source of the problem but the answer is equally puzzling.
> The problem was caused by a missing # before a declare in the include file.
> All previous versions of POV-Ray have issued a warning but still rendered.
> It seems that 3.5 generates an error that is not explicitly related to the
> missing #.
Then the problem is known:
Message-ID: <ZrphVDA7lAF8EwA+@econym.demon.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2001 01:01:47 +0000
From: Mike Williams <mik### [at] nospamplease>
Reply-To: Mike Williams <mik### [at] econymdemoncouk>
Newsgroups: povray.beta-test
Subject: Known Bugs Dec 10
Xref: news.povray.org povray.beta-test:3322
Post a reply to this message
|
|