POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.beta-test : [doc] compiler version Server Time
2 Nov 2024 09:17:52 EDT (-0400)
  [doc] compiler version (Message 1 to 10 of 11)  
Goto Latest 10 Messages Next 1 Messages >>>
From:
Subject: [doc] compiler version
Date: 7 Jan 2002 12:03:32
Message: <22lj3u0v1bg47hutnm29okf84u048hchjf@4ax.com>
POV 3.5 b 9

Considering two compile versions of current betas I suppose there will be two
official compilations just like for 3.1. So I suppose this sentence from 8.3.1.1
is outdated : " We currently only support VC++ v6 and perhaps v5. ".

ABX


Post a reply to this message

From: ingo
Subject: Re: [doc] compiler version
Date: 8 Jan 2002 06:46:28
Message: <Xns9190822C5D8C7seed7@povray.org>

wrote:

> " We currently only support VC++ v6 and perhaps v5. ".
> 
> 

Since section 8.4 is not written at all yet and I have no information 
about what compiler(s) will be used for the final version(s), I'll leave 
it as it is. It will get a note in the todo list though.

Thanks,

Ingo


Post a reply to this message

From:
Subject: Re: [doc] compiler version
Date: 8 Jan 2002 07:07:26
Message: <v2ol3u053gtnh2di2njsm4j7sfc02dcvqd@4ax.com>
On 8 Jan 2002 06:46:28 -0500, ingo <ing### [at] homenl> wrote:
> Since section 8.4 is not written at all yet

What about sections connected with include files? Are they finished?

ABX


Post a reply to this message

From: ingo
Subject: Re: [doc] compiler version
Date: 8 Jan 2002 07:51:58
Message: <Xns91908D4776B5Cseed7@povray.org>

wrote:

> What about sections connected with include files? Are they finished?
> 
> 

There are one or two question marks left, but yes it's finished (unless 
there are changes made to the include files themselves).

Ingo


Post a reply to this message

From:
Subject: Re: [doc] compiler version
Date: 9 Jan 2002 05:25:40
Message: <186o3usrk6sfufhljqn91c8p77cu7ve7n2@4ax.com>
On 8 Jan 2002 07:51:58 -0500, ingo <ing### [at] homenl> wrote:
> There are one or two question marks left, but yes it's finished (unless 
> there are changes made to the include files themselves).

HFComputeNormal and HFSphereRcrse from shapes.inc seem not described.

7.8.1 & 7.8.2 give information via name of variables
7.8.4 & 7.8.5 give little text information
but 7.8.3 has no information at all

ABX


Post a reply to this message

From: ingo
Subject: Re: [doc] compiler version
Date: 9 Jan 2002 13:07:07
Message: <Xns9191C2B604178seed7@povray.org>

wrote:

> HFComputeNormal and HFSphereRcrse from shapes.inc seem not described.
> 
> 7.8.1 & 7.8.2 give information via name of variables
> 7.8.4 & 7.8.5 give little text information
> but 7.8.3 has no information at all
> 

I'll look int this,

Thank,

Ingo


Post a reply to this message

From: Christopher James Huff
Subject: Re: [doc] compiler version
Date: 9 Jan 2002 19:58:32
Message: <chrishuff-95A404.19591409012002@netplex.aussie.org>
In article <186o3usrk6sfufhljqn91c8p77cu7ve7n2@4ax.com>,
 W?odzimierz ABX Skiba <abx### [at] babilonorg> wrote:

> HFComputeNormal and HFSphereRcrse from shapes.inc seem not described.

These are internal macros, the user is never intended to use them.

-- 
 -- 
Christopher James Huff <chr### [at] maccom>


Post a reply to this message

From: ingo
Subject: Re: [doc] compiler version
Date: 10 Jan 2002 07:58:33
Message: <Xns91928E66052D5seed7@povray.org>
in news:chr### [at] netplexaussieorg Christopher 
James Huff wrote:

> These are internal macros, the user is never intended to use them.
>

Maybe I should just mention that in the docs.

Ingo


Post a reply to this message

From: Rune
Subject: Re: [doc] compiler version
Date: 10 Jan 2002 10:36:15
Message: <3c3db4ef@news.povray.org>
"ingo" wrote:
> Christopher James Huff wrote:
> > These are internal macros, the user is never
> > intended to use them.
>
> Maybe I should just mention that in the docs.

It would be a more logical choice to make some comments about it in the
include file... It is only by looking through the include file that users
discover those macros in the first place.

Rune
--
3D images and anims, include files, tutorials and more:
Rune's World:    http://rsj.mobilixnet.dk (updated Jan 2)
POV-Ray Users:   http://rsj.mobilixnet.dk/povrayusers/
POV-Ray Webring: http://webring.povray.co.uk


Post a reply to this message

From: ingo
Subject: Re: [doc] compiler version
Date: 10 Jan 2002 11:22:22
Message: <Xns9192B0F3AA60Eseed7@povray.org>
in news:3c3db4ef@news.povray.org Rune wrote:

> It would be a more logical choice to make some comments about it in the
> include file...

Yes

Ingo


Post a reply to this message

Goto Latest 10 Messages Next 1 Messages >>>

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.