 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Skiba <abx### [at] babilon org> wrote:
> #macro B() array#local C=1;#while(C<=5)[C]#local C=C+1;#end #end
> #local A=B()
>
> it still not work with beta 6
Move the "array" out of the macro perhaps? Or have the whole declare in the
macro?
____________________________________________________
Thorsten Froehlich, Duisburg, Germany
e-mail: tho### [at] trfde
Visit POV-Ray on the web: http://mac.povray.org
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> What about #macro inside #macro? #switch inside
> #switch? Or mixing: #local inside #macro?
There's a difference between something like
#declare A#declare A=0;=1;
and something like
#switch (Something)
...
#switch (SomethingElse)
...
#end
...
#end
In the first case, the second #declare is actually *inside* the first
#declare. In the second case, the second switch is *between* the first
#switch and the first #end. (I know that's also commonly called "inside" but
it's a different kind of "inside".)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Fri, 26 Oct 2001 15:48:02 +0200, "Thorsten Froehlich"
<tho### [at] trfde> wrote:
> > #macro B() array#local C=1;#while(C<=5)[C]#local C=C+1;#end #end
> > #local A=B()
> >
> > it still not work with beta 6
>
> Move the "array" out of the macro perhaps?
No. It not work and cursor is wrongly positioned inside line when
showing error.
> Or have the whole declare in the
> macro?
The same error: Expected 'object or directive'.
And the same thing appear when I call elements of declared array. This
not work:
#local A=array[1][1][1][1][1]{{{{{0}}}}}
#local B=A #local C=1;#while(C<=5)[0]#local C=C+1;#end
Do you agree it should works ? I ask becouse it could shorten a lot my
macros for arrays.inc requested by Rune.
ABX
--
#declare _=function(a,b,x){((a^2)+(b^2))^.5-x}#default {pigment{color rgb 1}}
union{plane{y,-3}plane{-x,-3}finish{reflection 1 ambient 0}}isosurface{ //ABX
function{_(x-2,y,1)|_((x+y)*.7,z,.1)|_((x+y+2)*.7,z,.1)|_(x/2+y*.8+1.5,z,.1)}
contained_by{box{<0,-3,-.1>,<3,0,.1>}}translate z*15finish{ambient 1}}//POV35
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Fri, 26 Oct 2001 09:57:07 -0400, "Anders K." <and### [at] f2scom>
wrote:
> > What about #macro inside #macro? #switch inside
> > #switch? Or mixing: #local inside #macro?
>
> There's a difference between something like ...
yes, but I thought about different inside than you :-)
look at below syntax and try answer how many "1" should be printed out
?
#macro Go(Level)
#debug "1\n"
#switch (Level>0?Go(Level-1):0)
#case(0) 1 #break
#end
#end
#local A=Go(1);
it produces 98 lines of "1" and error "to many nested symbol tables".
why ?
perhaps it is not the same bug but ...
ABX
--
#declare _=function(a,b,x){((a^2)+(b^2))^.5-x}#default {pigment{color rgb 1}}
union{plane{y,-3}plane{-x,-3}finish{reflection 1 ambient 0}}isosurface{ //ABX
function{_(x-2,y,1)|_((x+y)*.7,z,.1)|_((x+y+2)*.7,z,.1)|_(x/2+y*.8+1.5,z,.1)}
contained_by{box{<0,-3,-.1>,<3,0,.1>}}translate z*15finish{ambient 1}}//POV35
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Skiba <abx### [at] babilonorg> wrote:
> #local A=array[1][1][1][1][1]{{{{{0}}}}}
> #local B=A #local C=1;#while(C<=5)[0]#local C=C+1;#end
>
> Do you agree it should works ? I ask becouse it could shorten a lot my
> macros for arrays.inc requested by Rune.
Well, it doesn't really matter is it should work - as pointed out earlier, I
don't think it is going to change in 3.5. Only if it worked in 3.1 I would
say it should work in 3.5.
Thorsten
____________________________________________________
Thorsten Froehlich, Duisburg, Germany
e-mail: tho### [at] trfde
Visit POV-Ray on the web: http://mac.povray.org
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> #macro Go(Level)
> #debug "1\n"
> #switch (Level>0?Go(Level-1):0)
> #case(0) 1 #break
> #end
> #end
The problem here is that Go(Level - 1) is *always* evaluated, whether Level
> 0 or not, because POV-Ray doesn't use short-circuit evaluation.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Fri, 26 Oct 2001 16:25:48 +0200, "Thorsten Froehlich"
<tho### [at] trfde> wrote:
> Well, it doesn't really matter is it should work - as pointed out earlier, I
> don't think it is going to change in 3.5. Only if it worked in 3.1 I would
> say it should work in 3.5.
Could anybody check this ? I have 3.1 uninstalled.
ABX
--
#declare _=function(a,b,x){((a^2)+(b^2))^.5-x}#default {pigment{color rgb 1}}
union{plane{y,-3}plane{-x,-3}finish{reflection 1 ambient 0}}isosurface{ //ABX
function{_(x-2,y,1)|_((x+y)*.7,z,.1)|_((x+y+2)*.7,z,.1)|_(x/2+y*.8+1.5,z,.1)}
contained_by{box{<0,-3,-.1>,<3,0,.1>}}translate z*15finish{ambient 1}}//POV35
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Fri, 26 Oct 2001 10:38:59 -0400, "Anders K." <and### [at] f2scom>
wrote:
> > #macro Go(Level)
> > #debug "1\n"
> > #switch (Level>0?Go(Level-1):0)
> > #case(0) 1 #break
> > #end
> > #end
>
> The problem here is that Go(Level - 1) is *always* evaluated, whether Level
> 0 or not, because POV-Ray doesn't use short-circuit evaluation.
yes, right, I missed this.
but how it should looks with #if ?
it seems not work too.
ABX
--
#declare _=function(a,b,x){((a^2)+(b^2))^.5-x}#default {pigment{color rgb 1}}
union{plane{y,-3}plane{-x,-3}finish{reflection 1 ambient 0}}isosurface{ //ABX
function{_(x-2,y,1)|_((x+y)*.7,z,.1)|_((x+y+2)*.7,z,.1)|_(x/2+y*.8+1.5,z,.1)}
contained_by{box{<0,-3,-.1>,<3,0,.1>}}translate z*15finish{ambient 1}}//POV35
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> > > #macro Go(Level)
> > > #debug "1\n"
> > > #switch (Level>0?Go(Level-1):0)
> > > #case(0) 1 #break
> > > #end
> > > #end
> >
> > The problem here is that Go(Level - 1) is *always* evaluated, whether
Level
> > 0 or not, because POV-Ray doesn't use short-circuit evaluation.
>
> yes, right, I missed this.
> but how it should looks with #if ?
> it seems not work too.
Well, there's also another problem: if the result of the #switch statement
isn't 0, the macro doesn't return anything, which causes errors. I'm not
sure what you meant to write, but this is definately not a bug in POV-Ray.
Anders
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>
> <abx### [at] babilonorg> wrote:
> > #macro B() array#local C=1;#while(C<=5)[C]#local C=C+1;#end #end
> > #local A=B()
> >
> > it still not work with beta 6
>
> but this works fine
>
> #local A=array[#local C=1;#while(C<=4)C][#local C=C+1;#end 5]
Are you REALLY sure that it is necessary
to EVER write such ugly lines of code ???
Tor Olav
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
