Am 04.09.2016 um 16:44 schrieb StephenS:
>> If you have the time of course.
> I have many of the builds, maybe some experimental, ops.
> 8451792 av100 not valid
> 8558038 av124 working
> 8586521 av129 not valid
That's seriously odd, as the build process hadn't changed between the
I presume that "not valid" means Windows XP is claiming the .exe to be
not a valid XP application, and that you're making sure to run the
32-bit version, right?
Post a reply to this message