Bob Hughes wrote:
> Hopefully something can be figured out about it. Any other info I can 
> possibly provide? Just name it.

unless it has the function name or an address, probably not.

if you can still make it happen with beta 9, let me know and I'll see if I
can build a version that hooks the pure virtual function default handler with
something that gives more information.

thanks,

-- Chris

Post a reply to this message