Stephen <mca### [at] aolcom> wrote:
> On 2/12/2017 7:39 PM, omniverse wrote:
> > Looks good! Sure helps add fluidity having movement... hey, a thought...
>
> And a slight movement in the sky would help with a sense of "time going by".

Yeah, good idea, makes me think time lapse photography to get a real sense of
actual build time. Although sunrise to sunset would indicate a slow build for
what's there right now, so maybe either sunrise to noon or noon to sunset until
more complete.
Or am I overthinking this?  ;)

Post a reply to this message

On 2/12/2017 9:49 PM, omniverse wrote:
> Stephen <mca### [at] aolcom> wrote:
>> On 2/12/2017 7:39 PM, omniverse wrote:
>>> Looks good! Sure helps add fluidity having movement... hey, a thought...
>>
>> And a slight movement in the sky would help with a sense of "time going by".
>
> Yeah, good idea, makes me think time lapse photography to get a real sense of
> actual build time. Although sunrise to sunset would indicate a slow build for
> what's there right now, so maybe either sunrise to noon or noon to sunset until
> more complete.
> Or am I overthinking this?  ;)
>
>
>
No, dawn to dusk would be my preference.
A good days work. :-)

-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On 13-2-2017 0:47, Stephen wrote:
> On 2/12/2017 9:49 PM, omniverse wrote:
>> Stephen <mca### [at] aolcom> wrote:
>>> On 2/12/2017 7:39 PM, omniverse wrote:
>>>> Looks good! Sure helps add fluidity having movement... hey, a
>>>> thought...
>>>
>>> And a slight movement in the sky would help with a sense of "time
>>> going by".
>>
>> Yeah, good idea, makes me think time lapse photography to get a real
>> sense of
>> actual build time. Although sunrise to sunset would indicate a slow
>> build for
>> what's there right now, so maybe either sunrise to noon or noon to
>> sunset until
>> more complete.
>> Or am I overthinking this?  ;)
>>
>>
>>
> No, dawn to dusk would be my preference.
> A good days work. :-)
>

With a pause at noon surely? The man needs to eat! ;-)

-- 
Thomas

Post a reply to this message

On 2/13/2017 7:55 AM, Thomas de Groot wrote:
> On 13-2-2017 0:47, Stephen wrote:
>> On 2/12/2017 9:49 PM, omniverse wrote:
>>> Stephen <mca### [at] aolcom> wrote:
>>>> On 2/12/2017 7:39 PM, omniverse wrote:
>>>>> Looks good! Sure helps add fluidity having movement... hey, a
>>>>> thought...
>>>>
>>>> And a slight movement in the sky would help with a sense of "time
>>>> going by".
>>>
>>> Yeah, good idea, makes me think time lapse photography to get a real
>>> sense of
>>> actual build time. Although sunrise to sunset would indicate a slow
>>> build for
>>> what's there right now, so maybe either sunrise to noon or noon to
>>> sunset until
>>> more complete.
>>> Or am I overthinking this?  ;)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> No, dawn to dusk would be my preference.
>> A good days work. :-)
>>
>
> With a pause at noon surely? The man needs to eat! ;-)
>

Only mad dogs and Englishmen go out in the midday sun. Sorry. :-)


-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On 13-2-2017 9:37, Stephen wrote:
> On 2/13/2017 7:55 AM, Thomas de Groot wrote:
>> On 13-2-2017 0:47, Stephen wrote:
>>> On 2/12/2017 9:49 PM, omniverse wrote:
>>>> Stephen <mca### [at] aolcom> wrote:
>>>>> On 2/12/2017 7:39 PM, omniverse wrote:
>>>>>> Looks good! Sure helps add fluidity having movement... hey, a
>>>>>> thought...
>>>>>
>>>>> And a slight movement in the sky would help with a sense of "time
>>>>> going by".
>>>>
>>>> Yeah, good idea, makes me think time lapse photography to get a real
>>>> sense of
>>>> actual build time. Although sunrise to sunset would indicate a slow
>>>> build for
>>>> what's there right now, so maybe either sunrise to noon or noon to
>>>> sunset until
>>>> more complete.
>>>> Or am I overthinking this?  ;)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> No, dawn to dusk would be my preference.
>>> A good days work. :-)
>>>
>>
>> With a pause at noon surely? The man needs to eat! ;-)
>>
>
> Only mad dogs and Englishmen go out in the midday sun. Sorry. :-)
>
>

Nah! in the UK it is always drizzling... :-)

[or was, before climate change...]

-- 
Thomas

Post a reply to this message

On 2/13/2017 12:35 PM, Thomas de Groot wrote:
> Nah! in the UK it is always drizzling... :-)


You should know. The Netherlands often gets our leftover weather. ;-)

-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

Am 2017-02-13 08:18, also sprach Stephen:
> On 2/13/2017 12:35 PM, Thomas de Groot wrote:
>> Nah! in the UK it is always drizzling... :-)
>
>
> You should know. The Netherlands often gets our leftover weather. ;-)
>

Netherlands second!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ELD2AwFN9Nc


-- 
dik

Post a reply to this message

"omniverse" <omn### [at] charternet> wrote:
> Looks good! Sure helps add fluidity having movement... hey, a thought... which
> you seemed to be hinting at already. Camera view moving around from wall to wall
> would give it less slideshow feel too.
>
>
> Bob

I really like the camera movement.

https://youtu.be/a6MPNCVGZm8

Ken

Post a reply to this message

Stephen <mca### [at] aolcom> wrote:
> On 2/12/2017 7:39 PM, omniverse wrote:
> > Looks good! Sure helps add fluidity having movement... hey, a thought...
>
> And a slight movement in the sky would help with a sense of "time going by".
>
> --
>
> Regards
>      Stephen

I have been considering the sky movement from the very start, but I am not going
to work on that until the shed is complete.  Complete build slab to siding to
roof, in one day, (one day in the animation that is).

Post a reply to this message

"Klewlis" <nomail@nomail> wrote:

Anyone know why this works:

camera {
    location <-240, 100, 118>
    //direction <0, 0,  3.0>
    //right x*1.33
    look_at <0, 50, 118>
//experimental
    #if (frame_number>5)
            rotate x*(frame_number*10)
    #end
//#end experimental
}

But this doesn't:

camera {
    location <-240, 100, 118>
    //direction <0, 0,  3.0>
    //right x*1.33
    look_at <0, 50, 118>
//experimental
        #while (frame_number<11)
            rotate x*(frame_number*10)
        #end
//#end experimental
}

Post a reply to this message