 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Am 05.11.2016 um 01:49 schrieb rodv92:
> Hi there,
>
> i am thinking of the tools i could use to make an animation of a camera
> accelerating toward 0,99c speed.
>
> If i remember well, i would have to use a widening focal to make the direction
> the camera is going appear as if it was receding and concentrating the field of
> view toward a point.
>
> For this i could use some kind of conical media, going darker at the sides and
> adding redshift effects, and chromatic aberrations.
>
> See : www.youtube.com/watch?v=JQnHTKZBTI4
("This video is not available in your country.")
Oh great.
I hate YouTube.
Anyway:
From what I know you'll need more than just a distortion of the field of
view; most notably, objects will appear "rotated" somehow.
There used to be a patched version of POV-Ray specifically designed to
simulate relativistic effects. It'll be quite out of date, but maybe
it'll do what you need.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
clipka <ano### [at] anonymous org> wrote:
> Am 05.11.2016 um 01:49 schrieb rodv92:
> > Hi there,
> >
> > i am thinking of the tools i could use to make an animation of a camera
> > accelerating toward 0,99c speed.
> >
> > If i remember well, i would have to use a widening focal to make the direction
> > the camera is going appear as if it was receding and concentrating the field of
> > view toward a point.
> >
> > For this i could use some kind of conical media, going darker at the sides and
> > adding redshift effects, and chromatic aberrations.
> >
> > See : www.youtube.com/watch?v=JQnHTKZBTI4
>
> ("This video is not available in your country.")
> Oh great.
> I hate YouTube.
I was going to see if I could find something else similar enough but instead
this other web page about physics rendered with P-R caught my attention.
Includes relativistic effects and links to more.
http://bugman123.com/Physics/index.html
The YouTube animation basically shows a series of accelerations showing a
stretching forward viewpoint and curving surroundings together with shifting
color (Redshift), also lack of color nearby.
> From what I know you'll need more than just a distortion of the field of
> view; most notably, objects will appear "rotated" somehow.
>
> There used to be a patched version of POV-Ray specifically designed to
> simulate relativistic effects. It'll be quite out of date, but maybe
> it'll do what you need.
Searched and found this web page of text+pictures about that. Was based on
POV-Ray 2.0, no luck locating the actual program. All broken links, as well as
the one from povray.org
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/2574193_Relativistic_Ray-Tracing_Simulating_the_Visual_Appearance_of_Rapidly_M
oving_Objects
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 11/5/2016 12:32 PM, omniverse wrote:
> I was going to see if I could find something else similar
I remember a video made with a patched version of povray from years ago.
I have never been able to find it again.
But using the wayback machine you can download the source code here
https://web.archive.org/web/19970220101552/http://www.cs.mu.oz.au/~andrbh/raytrace/raytrace_source.html
I hope it is the right one.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 11/5/2016 1:36 PM, Stephen wrote:
> On 11/5/2016 12:32 PM, omniverse wrote:
>> I was going to see if I could find something else similar
>
> I remember a video made with a patched version of povray from years ago.
> I have never been able to find it again.
> But using the wayback machine you can download the source code here
>
>
https://web.archive.org/web/19970220101552/http://www.cs.mu.oz.au/~andrbh/raytrace/raytrace_source.html
>
>
> I hope it is the right one.
>
This was the thread I found it in.
http://news.povray.org/povray.unofficial.patches/thread/%3Cweb.3de6ef98c20e2bf3c571aa6c0%40news.povray.org%3E/?mtop=199902
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Am 05.11.2016 um 14:36 schrieb Stephen:
> On 11/5/2016 12:32 PM, omniverse wrote:
>> I was going to see if I could find something else similar
>
> I remember a video made with a patched version of povray from years ago.
> I have never been able to find it again.
> But using the wayback machine you can download the source code here
>
>
https://web.archive.org/web/19970220101552/http://www.cs.mu.oz.au/~andrbh/raytrace/raytrace_source.html
Just 722 kByte in 46 source code files? With makefiles and all?
Wow -- if only modern POV-Ray was that lean ;)
Then again, that was over 20 years ago...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
VSauce did an episode on this, so it probably contains information which is
probably current / accurate.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3pAnRKD4raY
Hope that may help.
As others have pointed out, there have been a few attempts to do this in
POV-Ray. Very nice job digging that all up - source and everything! :)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 11/5/2016 1:50 PM, clipka wrote:
> Am 05.11.2016 um 14:36 schrieb Stephen:
>> On 11/5/2016 12:32 PM, omniverse wrote:
>>> I was going to see if I could find something else similar
>>
>> I remember a video made with a patched version of povray from years ago.
>> I have never been able to find it again.
>> But using the wayback machine you can download the source code here
>>
>>
https://web.archive.org/web/19970220101552/http://www.cs.mu.oz.au/~andrbh/raytrace/raytrace_source.html
>
> Just 722 kByte in 46 source code files? With makefiles and all?
>
> Wow -- if only modern POV-Ray was that lean ;)
I am sure you could do better. ÜbertreibenPov?
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Stephen <mca### [at] aolcom> wrote:
> But using the wayback machine you can download the source code here
>
https://web.archive.org/web/19970220101552/http://www.cs.mu.oz.au/~andrbh/raytrace/raytrace_source.html
Ooooh yeah, source code for it in link there... now if I can recall how to
compile those things! thinking... nope. Going to need a refresher course, and a
compiler again!
Thanks very much Stephen!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 11/5/2016 2:10 PM, omniverse wrote:
> Stephen <mca### [at] aolcom> wrote:
>> But using the wayback machine you can download the source code here
>>
https://web.archive.org/web/19970220101552/http://www.cs.mu.oz.au/~andrbh/raytrace/raytrace_source.html
>
> Ooooh yeah, source code for it in link there... now if I can recall how to
> compile those things! thinking... nope. Going to need a refresher course, and a
> compiler again!
>
> Thanks very much Stephen!
>
>
It will cost you an animation. :)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
clipka <ano### [at] anonymousorg> wrote:
> Then again, that was over 20 years ago...
Hey, watch that. I remember using POV-Ray 1.somethingoranother. Can't remember
which version exactly. But I have not used POV-Ray in 15 or 20 years or more.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
