 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I need a program to create an animation from a series of images. The
program I’ve used in the past (TMPGEnc) has changed beyond my needs. It
now only joins video clips and if I try to use images it produces a
slideshow.
Does anyone have a recommendation for a programme that is not a command
line one?
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
IIRC I used to use that one way back when.
I use VideoMach now - seems pretty simple to open, select all my png's, and
click "export" to make AVI's, gifs, etc.
I use Format Factory for doing other things if I have a problem exporting to
that file format directly.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 3/14/2016 5:00 PM, Bald Eagle wrote:
> IIRC I used to use that one way back when.
> I use VideoMach now - seems pretty simple to open, select all my png's, and
> click "export" to make AVI's, gifs, etc.
Thanks I had forgotten about that. It does the job. :-)
> I use Format Factory for doing other things if I have a problem exporting to
> that file format directly.
>
>
I'll check that out.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Stephen <mca### [at] aol com> wrote:
> I need a program to create an animation from a series of images. The
> program I’ve used in the past (TMPGEnc) has changed beyond my needs. It
> now only joins video clips and if I try to use images it produces a
> slideshow.
> Does anyone have a recommendation for a programme that is not a command
> line one?
>
> --
>
> Regards
> Stephen
Than Blender for this purpose is bad?
AVI-RAW,AVI-JPEG,Frame-Server,H-264,MPEG,OGG-Theora,XVid...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 3/16/2016 1:38 PM, LanuHum wrote:
> Stephen <mca### [at] aolcom> wrote:
>> I need a program to create an animation from a series of images. The
>> program I’ve used in the past (TMPGEnc) has changed beyond my needs. It
>> now only joins video clips and if I try to use images it produces a
>> slideshow.
>> Does anyone have a recommendation for a programme that is not a command
>> line one?
>>
>> --
>>
>> Regards
>> Stephen
>
> Than Blender for this purpose is bad?
> AVI-RAW,AVI-JPEG,Frame-Server,H-264,MPEG,OGG-Theora,XVid...
>
>
Thanks, I know that you can use Blender but I've not looked at how to do
it. Too much brain power involved for the simple task I wanted it for. ^-^
I was testing something and did not want to introduce another factor
into the test.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Stephen <mca### [at] aolcom> wrote:
> I need a program to create an animation from a series of images. The
> program I’ve used in the past (TMPGEnc) has changed beyond my needs. It
> now only joins video clips and if I try to use images it produces a
> slideshow.
> Does anyone have a recommendation for a programme that is not a command
> line one?
>
> --
>
> Regards
> Stephen
:) :) :)
It is easy. It isn't necessary to study Blender for this purpose. Look at a
lesson:
http://news.povray.org/povray.tools.general/message/%3Cweb.56e9a179e15489687a3e03fe0%40news.povray.org%3E/#%3Cweb.56e9a
179e15489687a3e03fe0%40news.povray.org%3E
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 3/16/2016 6:15 PM, LanuHum wrote:
> t is easy. It isn't necessary to study Blender for this purpose. Look at a
> lesson:
>
http://news.povray.org/povray.tools.general/message/%3Cweb.56e9a179e15489687a3e03fe0%40news.povray.org%3E/#%3Cweb.56e9a
> 179e15489687a3e03fe0%40news.povray.org%3E
That ink is my Original Post, old chap. :-)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 3/16/2016 7:29 PM, Stephen wrote:
> That ink
Link. :-(
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Stephen <mca### [at] aolcom> wrote:
> On 3/16/2016 6:15 PM, LanuHum wrote:
> > t is easy. It isn't necessary to study Blender for this purpose. Look at a
> > lesson:
> >
http://news.povray.org/povray.tools.general/message/%3Cweb.56e9a179e15489687a3e03fe0%40news.povray.org%3E/#%3Cweb.5
6e9a
> > 179e15489687a3e03fe0%40news.povray.org%3E
>
>
> That ink is my Original Post, old chap. :-)
>
> --
>
> Regards
> Stephen
I understand. I made it that questions of the Blender collected in a separate
subject(thread)
:)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Am 2016-03-16 15:29, also sprach Stephen:
> On 3/16/2016 7:29 PM, Stephen wrote:
>> That ink
>
> Link. :-(
>
I liked "ink". Accurately described it. :)
--
dik
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 3/16/2016 7:56 PM, LanuHum wrote:
> Stephen <mca### [at] aolcom> wrote:
>> On 3/16/2016 6:15 PM, LanuHum wrote:
>>> t is easy. It isn't necessary to study Blender for this purpose. Look at a
>>> lesson:
>>>
http://news.povray.org/povray.tools.general/message/%3Cweb.56e9a179e15489687a3e03fe0%40news.povray.org%3E/#%3Cweb.5
> 6e9a
>>> 179e15489687a3e03fe0%40news.povray.org%3E
>>
>>
>> That ink is my Original Post, old chap. :-)
>>
>> --
>>
>> Regards
>> Stephen
>
> I understand. I made it that questions of the Blender collected in a separate
> subject(thread)
>
> :)
>
>
Ah! okay :-)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 3/16/2016 8:07 PM, dick balaska wrote:
> Am 2016-03-16 15:29, also sprach Stephen:
>> On 3/16/2016 7:29 PM, Stephen wrote:
>>> That ink
>>
>> Link. :-(
>>
> I liked "ink". Accurately described it. :)
>
:-)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Stephen <mca### [at] aolcom> wrote:
> On 3/16/2016 7:56 PM, LanuHum wrote:
> > Stephen <mca### [at] aolcom> wrote:
> >> On 3/16/2016 6:15 PM, LanuHum wrote:
> >>> t is easy. It isn't necessary to study Blender for this purpose. Look at a
> >>> lesson:
> >>>
http://news.povray.org/povray.tools.general/message/%3Cweb.56e9a179e15489687a3e03fe0%40news.povray.org%3E/#%3Cweb
.5
> > 6e9a
> >>> 179e15489687a3e03fe0%40news.povray.org%3E
> >>
> >>
> >> That ink is my Original Post, old chap. :-)
> >>
> >> --
> >>
> >> Regards
> >> Stephen
> >
> > I understand. I made it that questions of the Blender collected in a separate
> > subject(thread)
> >
> > :)
> >
> >
>
> Ah! okay :-)
>
> --
>
> Regards
> Stephen
It is a pity that many are frightened by Blender.
It is very good tool.
I communicated with people who used 3D-max, Maya, Cinema, but, now they use the
Blender.
I can always help to master this tool.
There is in the Blender the fact that I don't know. It because I don't want to
know that to me it isn't this: skulpting, grease pencil
I am not a sculptor and not the artist.
I am not able to mold figures from clay, I am not able to draw...
I am able to use Python to increase possibilities of creation of objects.
Again the translator wrote unclear abracadabra? :) :) :)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 3/17/2016 2:40 PM, LanuHum wrote:
> It is a pity that many are frightened by Blender.
> It is very good tool.
It is a very good tool and not as dificult as it was before.
> I communicated with people who used 3D-max, Maya, Cinema, but, now they use the
> Blender.
> I can always help to master this tool.
That is good.
> There is in the Blender the fact that I don't know. It because I don't want to
> know that to me it isn't this: skulpting, grease pencil
I have not used the grease pencil. When I dig my graphics tablet out, I
might try it.
> I am not a sculptor and not the artist.
> I am not able to mold figures from clay, I am not able to draw...
> I am able to use Python to increase possibilities of creation of objects.
I think I understand and art is art whether in the real world or the
virtual one.
> Again the translator wrote unclear abracadabra?:) :) :)
Abracadabra! A word that magicians say when they do magic.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Stephen <mca### [at] aolcom> wrote:
> On 3/17/2016 2:40 PM, LanuHum wrote:
>
> > Again the translator wrote unclear abracadabra?:) :) :)
>
> Abracadabra! A word that magicians say when they do magic.
>
> --
>
> Regards
> Stephen
:) :) :)
I meant:
My words for English-speaking users are nonsense.
Buddhists speak: flows (consciousnesses, reason, mind...as synonyms)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 3/17/2016 7:49 PM, LanuHum wrote:
> Stephen <mca### [at] aolcom> wrote:
>> On 3/17/2016 2:40 PM, LanuHum wrote:
>
>>
>>> Again the translator wrote unclear abracadabra?:) :) :)
>>
>> Abracadabra! A word that magicians say when they do magic.
>>
>> --
>>
>> Regards
>> Stephen
>
> :) :) :)
> I meant:
> My words for English-speaking users are nonsense.
> Buddhists speak: flows (consciousnesses, reason, mind...as synonyms)
>
>
>
>
So I thought and I agree.
Your gift of the tutorial was enlightening.
Monkey see, monkey do, ...understand. :)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
