 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 3 Jun 2002 05:28:41 -0400, Warp <war### [at] tag povrayorg> wrote:
> Do you understand what's the difference between a compressed BMP, a GIF
> and a JPG?
JPGs input still crashes RC6 ?
ABX
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> JPGs input still crashes RC6 ?
I haven't noticed that.
--
#macro M(A,N,D,L)plane{-z,-9pigment{mandel L*9translate N color_map{[0rgb x]
[1rgb 9]}scale<D,D*3D>*1e3}rotate y*A*8}#end M(-3<1.206434.28623>70,7)M(
-1<.7438.1795>1,20)M(1<.77595.13699>30,20)M(3<.75923.07145>80,99)// - Warp -
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Warp" <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote in message
news:3cfb4104@news.povray.org...
> > JPGs input still crashes RC6 ?
>
> I haven't noticed that.
Just cancelled a reply after I had thought this was said of RC5. In which
case, I say again here, it does not... crash RC5 anyway.
bob h
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Do you understand what's the difference between a compressed BMP, a GIF
> and a JPG?
Absolutely. 80-90%.
- Slime
[ http://www.slimeland.com/ ]
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Er, "80-90%" is how much i understand it, not the difference between them =)
- Slime
[ http://www.slimeland.com/ ]
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Slime <slm### [at] slimelandcom> wrote:
>> Do you understand what's the difference between a compressed BMP, a GIF
>> and a JPG?
> Absolutely. 80-90%.
<hint>
Well, my point is that BMP, GIF and JPG use different compression
algorithms.
</hint>
--
#macro M(A,N,D,L)plane{-z,-9pigment{mandel L*9translate N color_map{[0rgb x]
[1rgb 9]}scale<D,D*3D>*1e3}rotate y*A*8}#end M(-3<1.206434.28623>70,7)M(
-1<.7438.1795>1,20)M(1<.77595.13699>30,20)M(3<.75923.07145>80,99)// - Warp -
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> <hint>
> Well, my point is that BMP, GIF and JPG use different compression
> algorithms.
> </hint>
Are MPEG-1,2, and 4 really that different? I was assuming they were
variations on the same concept. Well, don't worry about it, you needn't
explain further, thanks =)
- Slime
[ http://www.slimeland.com/ ]
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Warp" <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote:
> > AVI in itself isn't a codec.
>
> Neither is MPEG.
>
> AVI is a container file for virtually any video and audio format. It is
> not a video/audio format in itself and does not define in any way the
format
> of the data it contains.
If more exactly, AVI is a subset of RIFF (which is THE container, BTW)
with... err, very high probability of presence of certain kind of chunks
('vids', for one, is present in 99.(9)% of them; you might run across some
AVI files w/o any video streams at all, or course...).
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Slime <slm### [at] slimelandcom> wrote:
> Are MPEG-1,2, and 4 really that different? I was assuming they were
> variations on the same concept. Well, don't worry about it, you needn't
> explain further, thanks =)
They are variations of the same concept, but are completely different in
implementation.
--
#macro M(A,N,D,L)plane{-z,-9pigment{mandel L*9translate N color_map{[0rgb x]
[1rgb 9]}scale<D,D*3D>*1e3}rotate y*A*8}#end M(-3<1.206434.28623>70,7)M(
-1<.7438.1795>1,20)M(1<.77595.13699>30,20)M(3<.75923.07145>80,99)// - Warp -
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Maybe some obscure software is capable of storing e-mails, word documents
and powerpoint presentations in AVI files. :-)
--
Apache
POV-Ray Cloth experiments: http://geitenkaas.dns2go.com/experiments/
Email: apa### [at] yahoocom
ICQ: 146690431
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
