|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
You can't load and save a radiosity map at the same time.
When I first read this, it seemed fairly obviously. But now, several
years later, it ocurrs to me - you might actually want to do this. For
example, if I wanted to render an animation with radiosity [oi! stop
laughing at the back there!] it might be nice if each frame could use
the rad data from previous frames, and also if it needs to take any
extra samples itself, add them back to the file...
Is there a technical reason why you can load and save at the same time?
Or is it just that nobody thought it would be a useful thing to do? (I
don't expect this will be changed *any* time soon - everybody is still
trying to get the new beta working right now...)
I suppose if I was feeling really psychotic, I could write a program to
take several radiosity files and merge them together... then I could
render the scene from all the angles that will be used, and merge the
resulting files. Not quite as good, but it's something.
[And of course, all of this assumes the scene isn't going to *change*
during the animation - that would totally alter the rad data!]
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Orchid XP v2" <voi### [at] devnull> wrote in message
news:43513330$1@news.povray.org...
> You can't load and save a radiosity map at the same time.
>
> When I first read this, it seemed fairly obviously. But now, several years
> later, it ocurrs to me - you might actually want to do this. For example,
> if I wanted to render an animation with radiosity [oi! stop laughing at
> the back there!] it might be nice if each frame could use the rad data
> from previous frames, and also if it needs to take any extra samples
> itself, add them back to the file...
>
> Is there a technical reason why you can load and save at the same time? Or
> is it just that nobody thought it would be a useful thing to do? (I don't
> expect this will be changed *any* time soon - everybody is still trying to
> get the new beta working right now...)
>
> I suppose if I was feeling really psychotic, I could write a program to
> take several radiosity files and merge them together... then I could
> render the scene from all the angles that will be used, and merge the
> resulting files. Not quite as good, but it's something.
>
> [And of course, all of this assumes the scene isn't going to *change*
> during the animation - that would totally alter the rad data!]
Hi Andy,
It's been a year since I attempted this, but I am quite sure it IS possible,
or I must have been hallucinating. I used it for a camera animation
sequence, where radiosity calcs were added to the file in each frame.
But at first, I couldn't get it to do this. Then I discovered where I was
going wrong: DON'T use .RCA extension for save_file_name and
load_file_name! It gets nixed to zero by the opening of the temporary
working file for write!
Instead, change the save_file_name and load_file_name to, eg "filename.rad",
and it's alright.
It'll:
1. Load data from opening the filename.RAD file for read,
2. Write new samples to the temporary working filename.RCA file,
3. When done, rewrite the lot to filename.RAD and delete filename.RCA
HTH
Brian
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Brian Elliott" <NotForSpam@AskIfUWant> wrote in message
news:4352507c$1@news.povray.org...
> It's been a year since I attempted this, but I am quite sure it IS
> possible, or I must have been hallucinating. I used it for a camera
> animation sequence, where radiosity calcs were added to the file in each
> frame.
PS, I HAVEN'T tried this with the 3.7 beta. Err, what else.. Yup, also
beware that after some time into the animation, the sheer mass of
accumulated radiosity data could get so large that it takes LONGER per frame
to load the data and render the frame, absorbing huge slabs of RAM in the
process, than it would have been emptying it and continuing with a clean
around a static object, so the file eventually stored data for a lot of
off-screen geometry and was more than 200MB in size.
Cheers again,
Brian
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|