On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 07:35:50 +0100, Thorsten Froehlich wrote:

> Guys, you are repeating incorrect assumptions and guesses already clarified
> in various previous discussions, particularly in the stills group. There is
> no uncertainty who "owns the site" or anything like that.

Thanks, Thorsten - I should've clarified that it wasn't clear to me
(because it isn't, as I have not been following the discussions that
closely).  I just get annoyed when people start making what sounds to me
like demands of others who are kind enough to volunteer their time to do
something.

But I've also been a little hypersensitive to the issue recently as well,
as I've recently had to deliver bad news to nearly a thousand people
about their status in a program, and I've had a few who felt entitled to
remain even though they didn't meet the requirements.  The responses have
ranged from sad understanding to outright threats.

This feeling of "entitlement" that some people have just drives me over
the edge sometimes.  Apologies if I caused anyone offense.

Jim

Post a reply to this message