And lo on 22 Aug 2004 12:41:35 -0400, Warp <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> did  
spake, saying:

> Phil Cook <phi### [at] rocainnospamfreeservecouk> wrote:
>> Nope :) Perhaps Switch_Value >= Low_Value
>
>   But why? It's the same thing.
>
Because the text reads Low_Value <= Switch_Value, Switch_Value<=High_Value  
and the example reads the equivalent of Switch_Value >= Low_Value,  
Switch_Value <= High_Value. Yes mathematically they are the same but it's  
not consistent grammatically.
--
Phil Cook

-- 
All thoughts and comments are my own unless otherwise stated and I am  
happy to be proven wrong.

Post a reply to this message