POV-Ray : Newsgroups : moray.win : Moray 3.5 and Pov3.6 ? Server Time
3 May 2024 03:41:40 EDT (-0400)
  Moray 3.5 and Pov3.6 ? (Message 1 to 7 of 7)  
From: Arne Kleinophorst
Subject: Moray 3.5 and Pov3.6 ?
Date: 15 Jun 2004 03:48:51
Message: <40cea9e3$1@news.povray.org>
Hi There,
anyone tried pov3.6 already? Is it working o.k. with moray? I did not 
dare to try it yet :-)

Greets

Arne


Post a reply to this message

From: Marc Jacquier
Subject: Re: Moray 3.5 and Pov3.6 ?
Date: 15 Jun 2004 09:39:51
Message: <40cefc27$1@news.povray.org>

de news: 40cea9e3$1@news.povray.org...
> Hi There,
> anyone tried pov3.6 already? Is it working o.k. with moray? I did not
> dare to try it yet :-)
>
I didn't face any problem :-)
Unclipped radiosity is a plus

Marc


Post a reply to this message

From: Stefan Viljoen
Subject: Re: Moray 3.5 and Pov3.6 ?
Date: 15 Jun 2004 09:41:01
Message: <40cefc6c@news.povray.org>
Arne Kleinophorst wrote:

> Hi There,
> anyone tried pov3.6 already? Is it working o.k. with moray? I did not
> dare to try it yet :-)
> 
> Greets
> 
> Arne

Hi Arne,

Well I resumed a trace I stopped on 3.5 with 3.6 (a Moray scene, obviously)
and it worked without a hitch. 

Guess that means Moray 3.5 will work just fine with 3.6.

Regards,
-- 
Stefan Viljoen
Software Support Technician
Polar Design Solutions


Post a reply to this message

From: Marc Jacquier
Subject: Re: Moray 3.5 and Pov3.6 ?
Date: 15 Jun 2004 11:51:50
Message: <40cf1b16$1@news.povray.org>

de news: 40cefc6c@news.povray.org...
> Hi Arne,
>
> Well I resumed a trace I stopped on 3.5 with 3.6 (a Moray scene,
obviously)
> and it worked without a hitch.
>
Just beware that radiosity does not render the same in both versions.
I tried that resuming with 3.6 a render started with 3.5, the version change
line was obvious.

Marc


Post a reply to this message

From: Jamie Davison
Subject: Re: Moray 3.5 and Pov3.6 ?
Date: 15 Jun 2004 13:56:40
Message: <MPG.1b394895fecb228598968b@news.povray.org>
> > Well I resumed a trace I stopped on 3.5 with 3.6 (a Moray scene,
> obviously)
> > and it worked without a hitch.
> >
> Just beware that radiosity does not render the same in both versions.
> I tried that resuming with 3.6 a render started with 3.5, the version change
> line was obvious.

IIRC resuming a radiosity trace even with the same version of POV will 
give you a noticeable line at the resume point.

Jamie.


Post a reply to this message

From: Warp
Subject: Re: Moray 3.5 and Pov3.6 ?
Date: 15 Jun 2004 14:25:06
Message: <40cf3f02@news.povray.org>
Jamie Davison <jam### [at] dslpipexcom> wrote:
> IIRC resuming a radiosity trace even with the same version of POV will 
> give you a noticeable line at the resume point.

  This shouldn't be true. POV-Ray saves a radiosity tree file for the
exact purpose of avoiding this.

-- 
#macro N(D)#if(D>99)cylinder{M()#local D=div(D,104);M().5,2pigment{rgb M()}}
N(D)#end#end#macro M()<mod(D,13)-6mod(div(D,13)8)-3,10>#end blob{
N(11117333955)N(4254934330)N(3900569407)N(7382340)N(3358)N(970)}//  - Warp -


Post a reply to this message

From: Marc Jacquier
Subject: Re: Moray 3.5 and Pov3.6 ?
Date: 15 Jun 2004 17:02:26
Message: <40cf63e2@news.povray.org>

40cf3f02@news.povray.org...
> Jamie Davison <jam### [at] dslpipexcom> wrote:
> > IIRC resuming a radiosity trace even with the same version of POV will
> > give you a noticeable line at the resume point.
>
>   This shouldn't be true. POV-Ray saves a radiosity tree file for the
> exact purpose of avoiding this.
>
I forgot to say that it was a two passes reloaded radiosity file
1st one at low resolution without reflections and refractions saving rad
file and 2nd with reflection and refraction reloading rad file
I didnt use Moray dial for this purpose but rather an InsertCode plugin
Marc


Post a reply to this message

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.