"Stephen" <mcavoysAT@aolDOTcom> schreef in bericht 
news:55cj849oqu2cp3uh5ljponto9i4l2jm8q1@4ax.com...
>>
> Yeah, the 20/20/20 should be a last resort IMO. I did not know that new 
> entrants
> could not vote. Maybe if a score is less than 5 a comment must be made
> compulsory (?)

This seems to be a good suggestion to me. I'll second that.

Thomas

Post a reply to this message

"St." <dot### [at] dotcom> schreef in bericht news:488993de@news.povray.org...
>
>  Hehe, you're not daft Thomas, far from it. :) You are perfectly correct 
> of course, and I have to again say that I didn't like that particular rule 
> myself. It was a way to try and get entrants to enter at another time, 
> rather than just enter once and then disappear never to be seen again. It 
> was also a way to stop vote rigging as there were a few who created extra 
> accounts. Anyway, I've now addressed this and now ALL members can vote 
> whether or not they have entered or will never enter. The rules have been 
> amended to reflect this, and additionally, I've also added that any member 
> can enter as many times as they want as long as it's a 'different' take on 
> the subject. This of course also applies to animations.
>

Excellent news, Steve! Let's look how it goes from here.

(still a lot to do on my next entry.... but it grows, it grows...)

Thomas

Post a reply to this message

On Fri, 25 Jul 2008 13:18:37 +0200, "Thomas de Groot" <t.d### [at] internlDOTnet>
wrote:

>
>(still a lot to do on my next entry.... but it grows, it grows...)

Mine doesn't, so there's a contrast <g>
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

"Thomas de Groot" <t.d### [at] internlDOTnet> wrote in message 
news:4889b68c$1@news.povray.org...
>
> "St." <dot### [at] dotcom> schreef in bericht news:488993de@news.povray.org...

> Excellent news, Steve! Let's look how it goes from here.
>
> (still a lot to do on my next entry.... but it grows, it grows...)

   Heh, I haven't even started yet! But, I do have a great idea based on an 
image I found on the net, but whether I can do it or not is a different 
matter. I'll give it a go though. I'm really looking forward to this round. 
:)

       ~Steve~


>
> Thomas
>
>

Post a reply to this message

"Stephen" <mcavoysAT@aolDOTcom> wrote in message 
news:55cj849oqu2cp3uh5ljponto9i4l2jm8q1@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 25 Jul 2008 11:27:51 +0100, "St." <dot### [at] dotcom> wrote:

> Yeah, the 20/20/20 should be a last resort IMO. I did not know that new 
> entrants
> could not vote. Maybe if a score is less than 5 a comment must be made
> compulsory (?)

   Oh, that sounds like a good idea. I'm seeing Colin this weekend so I'll 
discuss this.


>
>>> BTW in the stills challenge Ian MacKay's image is not shown.
>>
>>     Ah, thanks for pointing that out Stephen, this is because I had to
>>change Ian's username to give him voting rights on animations. I'll email
>>him and ask him to re-upload the image.
>>
> Oh! Is he going to upload an animation? I hope so.

     No, I don't think so, unfortunately. He had voting rights for stills 
but not animations, so everybody now has voting rights on both. But because 
his username was only 3 digits, (which it shouldn't be), I had to change it 
before the 'admin' side of things would let me change the rights for anims.


>
>>   (See? I told you I was in a typing frenzy!)  :o)
>
> Those little fingers must be worn t the bone :)

    To the bone, I tell ye! To the bone!  :)

     ~Steve~


> -- 
>
> Regards
>     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On Fri, 25 Jul 2008 14:59:55 +0100, "St." <dot### [at] dotcom> wrote:

>
>"Stephen" <mcavoysAT@aolDOTcom> wrote in message 
>news:55cj849oqu2cp3uh5ljponto9i4l2jm8q1@4ax.com...
>> On Fri, 25 Jul 2008 11:27:51 +0100, "St." <dot### [at] dotcom> wrote:
>
>> Yeah, the 20/20/20 should be a last resort IMO. I did not know that new 
>> entrants
>> could not vote. Maybe if a score is less than 5 a comment must be made
>> compulsory (?)
>
>   Oh, that sounds like a good idea. I'm seeing Colin this weekend so I'll 
>discuss this.
>

Less than 5 is just a thought. Ooo! I;ve had one :)
>>
>>>> BTW in the stills challenge Ian MacKay's image is not shown.
>>>
>>>     Ah, thanks for pointing that out Stephen, this is because I had to
>>>change Ian's username to give him voting rights on animations. I'll email
>>>him and ask him to re-upload the image.
>>>
>> Oh! Is he going to upload an animation? I hope so.
>
>     No, I don't think so, unfortunately. He had voting rights for stills 
>but not animations, so everybody now has voting rights on both. But because 
>his username was only 3 digits, (which it shouldn't be), I had to change it 
>before the 'admin' side of things would let me change the rights for anims.
>
>
Shame, I'd like to see what he would do. :(

<Hint, hint :) >

>>
>>>   (See? I told you I was in a typing frenzy!)  :o)
>>
>> Those little fingers must be worn t the bone :)
>
>    To the bone, I tell ye! To the bone!  :)
>
Aye oop! 
:)
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

"Stephen" <mcavoysAT@aolDOTcom> schreef in bericht 
news:iodj8458n0nsb9pt85m64859m0076tcthk@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 25 Jul 2008 13:18:37 +0200, "Thomas de Groot" 
> <t.d### [at] internlDOTnet>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>(still a lot to do on my next entry.... but it grows, it grows...)
>
> Mine doesn't, so there's a contrast <g>

LOL!

Thomas

Post a reply to this message

"St." <dot### [at] dotcom> schreef in bericht news:4889c1ff$1@news.povray.org...
>
>>
>> (still a lot to do on my next entry.... but it grows, it grows...)
>
>   Heh, I haven't even started yet! But, I do have a great idea based on an 
> image I found on the net, but whether I can do it or not is a different 
> matter. I'll give it a go though. I'm really looking forward to this 
> round. :)
>

This round is not immediately obvious. I needed a couple of weeks to sort 
between options.

Thomas

Post a reply to this message