 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Congratulations, Norbert!
I really thought it was yet again a photo, then noticed that the
size was larger than past usual photo submissions, and looked at
your text description.
I had trouble convincing me it was raytraced. Looking closely,
I believe it, now. I think you have set a new standard of
quality for POV-Ray images!
--
Adrien Beau - adr### [at] free fr - http://adrien.beau.free.fr
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Forgot the URL, twice in a row... :-(
http://www.irtc.org/ftp/pub/stills/2001-06-30/warm_up.jpg
--
Adrien Beau - adr### [at] freefr - http://adrien.beau.free.fr
Mes propos n'engagent que moi et en aucun cas mes employeurs
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
this picture BEGS to be animated!!! ;o)
-peter
--
http://www.users.qwest.net/~dearmad
Why bother? I'm not interesting.
But... maybe "Ballet pour ma fille" will be.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thank you, but I really think, its too much honor for me.
I make the same experience like with all of my entries:
When the image is ready, I see only the mistakes. And then I always think I
really should have done it better. This period normally lasts about 3 to 4
months.
Then there is a chance to get pleasure from my own little work.
And its the same with "warm_up".
really good image...
Norbert
"Adrien Beau" <adr### [at] sycomorefr> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:3B41C0F3.C0686375@sycomore.fr...
> Congratulations, Norbert!
>
> I really thought it was yet again a photo, then noticed that the
> size was larger than past usual photo submissions, and looked at
> your text description.
>
> I had trouble convincing me it was raytraced. Looking closely,
> I believe it, now. I think you have set a new standard of
> quality for POV-Ray images!
>
> --
> Adrien Beau - adr### [at] freefr - http://adrien.beau.free.fr
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Do you mean an "almost perfetc" image, I think, bcos this one it's yet
"a really good image".
--
Jaime Vives Piqueres
La Persistencia de la Ignorancia
http://www.ignorancia.org/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Norbert,
Would it be possible for you to make your complete and final source code
available ? I'd really like to do a good hi-quality, hi-res (1280x1024)
version to use as my Windows desktop (even though, it'll probably keep my
poor old PIII933 busy for well over 100 hours!).
--
Scott Hill.
Software Engineer.
E-Mail : sco### [at] innocentcom
Pandora's Box : http://www.pandora-software.com
*Everything in this message/post is purely IMHO and no-one-else's*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Scott Hill wrote:
>
> (even though, it'll probably keep my
> poor old PIII933 busy for well over 100 hours!).
How dare you say "poor-old" P3-933 ?! :-O
--
Adrien Beau - adr### [at] freefr - http://adrien.beau.free.fr
Mes propos n'engagent que moi et en aucun cas mes employeurs
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Adrien Beau" <adr### [at] sycomorefr> wrote in message
news:3B442B67.AB7EC08D@sycomore.fr...
> Scott Hill wrote:
> >
> > (even though, it'll probably keep my
> > poor old PIII933 busy for well over 100 hours!).
>
> How dare you say "poor-old" P3-933 ?! :-O
>
Some of the Athlon performances that have been posted recently make it
seem poor and old...
--
Scott Hill.
Software Engineer.
E-Mail : sco### [at] innocentcom
Pandora's Box : http://www.pandora-software.com
*Everything in this message/post is purely IMHO and no-one-else's*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Hi Scott,
(ca. 45 MB zipped).
But you should reconsider it, since it would take about 415 h with your
"poor old" computer.
My 800*600 render took about 101.3 h and I have a 1400 MHz Athlon now.
With Win 98SE, no background image, no other programs running and 1 GB RAM
render is limited only by the processor (if you have more than 700 MB RAM at
least).
processor, I would guess about 19 d to render on your machine!
So write to me what you want.
Norbert
"Scott Hill" <sco### [at] innocentcom> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:3b440888@news.povray.org...
> Norbert,
>
> Would it be possible for you to make your complete and final source
code
> available ? I'd really like to do a good hi-quality, hi-res (1280x1024)
> version to use as my Windows desktop (even though, it'll probably keep my
> poor old PIII933 busy for well over 100 hours!).
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Hi Scott,
(ca. 45 MB zipped).
But you should reconsider it, since it would take about 415 h with your
"poor old" computer.
My 800*600 render took about 101.3 h and I have a 1400 MHz Athlon now.
With Win 98SE, no background image, no other programs running and 1 GB RAM
render is limited only by the processor (if you have more than 700 MB RAM at
least).
processor, I would guess about 19 d to render on your machine!
So write to me what you want.
Norbert
"Scott Hill" <sco### [at] innocentcom> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:3b440888@news.povray.org...
> Norbert,
>
> Would it be possible for you to make your complete and final source
code
> available ? I'd really like to do a good hi-quality, hi-res (1280x1024)
> version to use as my Windows desktop (even though, it'll probably keep my
> poor old PIII933 busy for well over 100 hours!).
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
