|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Well, I got sick last week, and now, thanks to that, it looks like my image
isn't going to be done in time. I already had to stop it once because some
of the bits were too slow (it stalled friday night and was still only a few
pixels later on sunday morning) It's now going, but I don't know that it'll
finish in time.
*wah* And this one was *good*
Geoff
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Geoff Wedig" <wed### [at] darwinepbicwruedu> wrote in message
news:3aed71d4@news.povray.org...
Let the IRTC admins know - they may be able to help out with a late
submission?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
You have my sympathy. I booked today off work so I could do some final
tweaks to my image, but the render time has now crept up to 15 hours (it was
just 8 a few days ago) which meant that I didn't have time to make any more
changes today before I submit, so I've just wasted a day of holiday!
Fortunately I'm pretty happy with my image as it stands.
You should submit anyway, I thought your WIPs were great :)
--
Tek
http://www.evilsuperbrain.com
Geoff Wedig <wed### [at] darwinepbicwruedu> wrote in message
news:3aed71d4@news.povray.org...
>
> Well, I got sick last week, and now, thanks to that, it looks like my
image
> isn't going to be done in time. I already had to stop it once because
some
> of the bits were too slow (it stalled friday night and was still only a
few
> pixels later on sunday morning) It's now going, but I don't know that
it'll
> finish in time.
>
> *wah* And this one was *good*
>
> Geoff
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Tek <tek### [at] evilsuperbraincom> wrote:
> You have my sympathy. I booked today off work so I could do some final
> tweaks to my image, but the render time has now crept up to 15 hours (it was
> just 8 a few days ago) which meant that I didn't have time to make any more
> changes today before I submit, so I've just wasted a day of holiday!
> Fortunately I'm pretty happy with my image as it stands.
> You should submit anyway, I thought your WIPs were great :)
Well, it looks like it's going to finish after all, but it's got a really
ugly spot, thanks to a modification that I made that didn't work out
correctly.
I'll probably go ahead and submit, though it really pains me.
Geoff
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Geoff Wedig <wed### [at] darwinepbicwruedu> wrote:
> Well, I got sick last week, and now, thanks to that, it looks like my image
> isn't going to be done in time. I already had to stop it once because some
> of the bits were too slow (it stalled friday night and was still only a few
> pixels later on sunday morning) It's now going, but I don't know that it'll
> finish in time.
> *wah* And this one was *good*
Well, it didn't finish. So you won't be seeing it in the contest. I'll try
posting it to bin.images when it's ready.
Geoff
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Geoff Wedig wrote:
>
> Well, I got sick last week, and now, thanks to that, it looks like my image
> isn't going to be done in time.
Due to other obligations, I was unable to continue my image after I
posted a WIP in p.b.i back in early March, so I decided not to enter the
round. Looking at the pictures, it seems I should have entered
anyways. Oh well!
P.S.: Why all these ant pictures? Did some people know in advance what
would be the next topic?
--
Francois Labreque | The surest sign of the existence of extra-
flabreque | terrestrial intelligence is that they never
@ | bothered to come down here and visit us!
videotron.ca | - Calvin
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Francois Labreque <fla### [at] videotronca> wrote:
> Geoff Wedig wrote:
>>
>> Well, I got sick last week, and now, thanks to that, it looks like my image
>> isn't going to be done in time.
> Due to other obligations, I was unable to continue my image after I
> posted a WIP in p.b.i back in early March, so I decided not to enter the
> round. Looking at the pictures, it seems I should have entered
> anyways. Oh well!
Yeah. I'm not really impressed with the quality this round. I should have
put in the work print. Oh well.
I have a good idea for next time, which would be titled "The wooing of
butterflies", but it requires creating clothing, and I don't think I have
the skill for that.
Oh well.
Geoff
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
To be honest, the overall level seems better than that for worship -
however, I expected a lot from that round, and not much from this one, so I
suspect it's mainly subjective...
IMHO, it's easy to be distracted by the low-quality images. A better test
would be to count the number of quality images in any round.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Tom Melly <tom### [at] tomandlucouk> wrote:
> To be honest, the overall level seems better than that for worship -
> however, I expected a lot from that round, and not much from this one, so I
> suspect it's mainly subjective...
> IMHO, it's easy to be distracted by the low-quality images. A better test
> would be to count the number of quality images in any round.
As always, there are a few good ones, but it seems less than usual. You're
right that it's mainly subjective.
Still, mine was one of the 'good' ones (IMO), so I wish it had finished.
Geoff
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |