 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Just looked at the irtc winners today.
Isn't it interesting that all 6 winner images are made with povray?
Does this mean that:
a) Users of other renderers don't know how to make a lab?
b) Voters were uncommonly biased towards povray?
c) Users of other renderers are finally giving up?
d) POV-Ray is just the best. Plain and simple.
--
main(i,_){for(_?--i,main(i+2,"FhhQHFIJD|FQTITFN]zRFHhhTBFHhhTBFysdB"[i]
):_;i&&_>1;printf("%s",_-70?_&1?"[]":" ":(_=0,"\n")),_/=2);} /*- Warp -*/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Warp wrote:
> Isn't it interesting that all 6 winner images are made with povray?
It is inspiring to see this happen.
> Does this mean that:
Does it have to have a meaning ?
> a) Users of other renderers don't know how to make a lab?
I have insuffecient data to formulate a meaningful response.
> b) Voters were uncommonly biased towards povray?
The IRTC has historically been biased towards POV-Ray.
> c) Users of other renderers are finally giving up?
I have insuffecient data to formulate a meaningful response.
> d) POV-Ray is just the best. Plain and simple.
There is a high probability of this based on my own opinion.
--
Ken Tyler
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
e) none of the above
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Lance Birch wrote:
>
> e) none of the above
The data does not support this conclusion.
--
Ken Tyler - 1400+ POV-Ray, Graphics, 3D Rendering, and Raytracing Links:
http://home.pacbell.net/tylereng/index.html http://www.povray.org/links/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I was adding an option, not answering.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 3 Dec 2000 10:04:04 -0500, Warp wrote:
> Just looked at the irtc winners today.
>
> Isn't it interesting that all 6 winner images are made with povray?
Well here's the stats.
POV (all flavours) 55
MAX 18
Blender 5
Lightwave 3
Carrara 1
Bryce 3
Cinema 4D 1
Strata 3D 1
Shade Professional 1
BMRT 1
Breakdown of pov versions:
POV (official versions) 41 // I'm sure this should be 42.
MegaPOV or Patched Versions 14
--
Cheers
Steve email mailto:ste### [at] zeropps uklinuxnet
%HAV-A-NICEDAY Error not enough coffee 0 pps.
web http://www.zeropps.uklinux.net/
or http://start.at/zero-pps
3:01am up 54 days, 5:25, 2 users, load average: 1.16, 1.04, 1.07
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Warp wrote:
>
> Just looked at the irtc winners today.
>
> Isn't it interesting that all 6 winner images are made with povray?
>
> Does this mean that:
> a) Users of other renderers don't know how to make a lab?
> b) Voters were uncommonly biased towards povray?
> c) Users of other renderers are finally giving up?
> d) POV-Ray is just the best. Plain and simple.
The meaning is inside you, Grasshopper.
--
Palestinians have an absolute and unencumbered right to resist
military occupation by Israel with lethal force and to direct
that lethal force against the criminal settlers.
-- The Iron Webmaster, 205
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Warp wrote:
> Just looked at the irtc winners today.
>
> Isn't it interesting that all 6 winner images are made with povray?
>
> Does this mean that:
> a) Users of other renderers don't know how to make a lab?
I doubt that.
> b) Voters were uncommonly biased towards povray?
I know that if an image is made in POV-Ray, I can judge it's technical
difficulty. If it's made is something else, I give it a standard 10. I have
no idea how hard or easy it is to pull off an effect in other programs.
> c) Users of other renderers are finally giving up?
I don't know.
> d) POV-Ray is just the best. Plain and simple.
Well, yeah. Duh. ; )
--
Josh English -- Lexiphanic Lethomaniac
eng### [at] spiritonecom
The POV-Ray Cyclopedia http://www.spiritone.com/~english/cyclopedia/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
