POV-Ray : Newsgroups : irtc.stills : mrviolet.jpg child porn? Server Time
23 Dec 2024 11:54:03 EST (-0500)
  mrviolet.jpg child porn? (Message 1 to 10 of 18)  
Goto Latest 10 Messages Next 8 Messages >>>
From: Francois Labreque
Subject: mrviolet.jpg child porn?
Date: 2 Jul 2002 17:10:02
Message: <3D221677.7080006@videotron.ca>
-- 
/*Francois Labreque*/#local a=x+y;#local b=x+a;#local c=a+b;#macro P(F//
/*    flabreque    */L)polygon{5,F,F+z,L+z,L,F pigment{rgb 9}}#end union
/*        @        */{P(0,a)P(a,b)P(b,c)P(2*a,2*b)P(2*b,b+c)P(b+c,<2,3>)
/*   videotron.ca  */}camera{location<6,1.25,-6>look_at a orthographic}


Post a reply to this message

From: Warp
Subject: Re: mrviolet.jpg child porn?
Date: 2 Jul 2002 18:17:52
Message: <3d222690@news.povray.org>
Since when every image containing a nude person is porn?

-- 
#macro M(A,N,D,L)plane{-z,-9pigment{mandel L*9translate N color_map{[0rgb x]
[1rgb 9]}scale<D,D*3D>*1e3}rotate y*A*8}#end M(-3<1.206434.28623>70,7)M(
-1<.7438.1795>1,20)M(1<.77595.13699>30,20)M(3<.75923.07145>80,99)// - Warp -


Post a reply to this message

From: fabien
Subject: Re: mrviolet.jpg
Date: 3 Jul 2002 06:15:30
Message: <3d22cec2$1@news.povray.org>
Anyone seeing a simple nude child as child porn should consult
a psychanalyst, quickly.

And don't ever put any suspicion over my friend Martial again.

Fabien.


Post a reply to this message

From: Martial
Subject: Re: mrviolet.jpg child porn?
Date: 3 Jul 2002 13:00:48
Message: <3d232dc0$1@news.povray.org>

nu, sans fourure ni plume et mauvais esprit....
Sans rancune.

Us here such as God created us:
naked, without fourure nor feather and bad spirit....
Without resentment

--
Martial


Post a reply to this message

From: Marc Jacquier
Subject: Re: mrviolet.jpg child porn?
Date: 3 Jul 2002 14:48:13
Message: <3d2346ed@news.povray.org>
What is this shit of a question?
Are you not able to see the difference between a not really nude (no genital
parts shown) gentle picture and pornography?
Too much puritanism is evil and suspicious, it could mean one's mind is not
clearly and sanely built.
BTW if you want to argue, put arguments and not only a polemical topic
Marc

news: 3D2### [at] videotronca...
>
> --
> /*Francois Labreque*/#local a=x+y;#local b=x+a;#local c=a+b;#macro P(F//
> /*    flabreque    */L)polygon{5,F,F+z,L+z,L,F pigment{rgb 9}}#end union
> /*        @        */{P(0,a)P(a,b)P(b,c)P(2*a,2*b)P(2*b,b+c)P(b+c,<2,3>)
> /*   videotron.ca  */}camera{location<6,1.25,-6>look_at a orthographic}
>


Post a reply to this message

From: Txemi Jendrix
Subject: RE: mrviolet.jpg child porn?
Date: 3 Jul 2002 15:43:48
Message: <3d2353f4@news.povray.org>
I think the porn is in the eyes that see more than in the image itself (wich
is not porn at all)
What will you say when you'll see "Deep Throat"?
Maybe Michelangelo should have edited "Hustler"?
What is bellow your dress?

Txemi Jendrix
tji### [at] euskalnetnet
http://www.geocities.com/txemijendrix


Post a reply to this message

From: Miaou
Subject: Re: mrviolet.jpg child porn?
Date: 3 Jul 2002 16:25:03
Message: <3d235d9f@news.povray.org>
IT'S NOT PORN ! It's art !

You should better ask if "d Final Dream" is porn (imho).


3D2### [at] videotronca...
>
> --
> /*Francois Labreque*/#local a=x+y;#local b=x+a;#local c=a+b;#macro P(F//
> /*    flabreque    */L)polygon{5,F,F+z,L+z,L,F pigment{rgb 9}}#end union
> /*        @        */{P(0,a)P(a,b)P(b,c)P(2*a,2*b)P(2*b,b+c)P(b+c,<2,3>)
> /*   videotron.ca  */}camera{location<6,1.25,-6>look_at a orthographic}
>


Post a reply to this message

From: Marc Jacquier
Subject: Re: mrviolet.jpg child porn?
Date: 3 Jul 2002 16:32:46
Message: <3d235f6e@news.povray.org>
Tu es trop gentil parfois Martial
Sometimes you are too gentle Martial
Marc

3d232dc0$1@news.povray.org...

> nu, sans fourure ni plume et mauvais esprit....
> Sans rancune.
>
> Us here such as God created us:
> naked, without fourure nor feather and bad spirit....
> Without resentment
>
> --
> Martial
>
>
>


Post a reply to this message

From: Francois Labreque
Subject: Re: mrviolet.jpg child porn?
Date: 3 Jul 2002 20:54:54
Message: <3D239CA3.1080107@videotron.ca>
Marc Jacquier wrote:
> What is this shit of a question?
> Are you not able to see the difference between a not really nude (no genital
> parts shown) gentle picture and pornography?

Calm down.

All I did was ask for people's opinions considering two facts:

1) Many people (I didn't say I was part of them) consider any naked 
child picture to be pornography (see the recent discussion on 
povray.off-topic on that subject).

2) The IRTC admins have removed a previous entry for fear of legal problems.

That is all.

I personally wouldn't classify a naked poser model riding a butterfly 
pornography, but there's nothing saying that Australian lawmakers don't 
(I honestly don't know!)

> BTW if you want to argue, put arguments and not only a polemical topic

Who said I wanted to argue?

-- 
/*Francois Labreque*/#local a=x+y;#local b=x+a;#local c=a+b;#macro P(F//
/*    flabreque    */L)polygon{5,F,F+z,L+z,L,F pigment{rgb 9}}#end union
/*        @        */{P(0,a)P(a,b)P(b,c)P(2*a,2*b)P(2*b,b+c)P(b+c,<2,3>)
/*   videotron.ca  */}camera{location<6,1.25,-6>look_at a orthographic}


Post a reply to this message

From: Warp
Subject: Re: mrviolet.jpg child porn?
Date: 3 Jul 2002 21:22:41
Message: <3d23a361@news.povray.org>
Francois Labreque <fla### [at] videotronca> wrote:
> 2) The IRTC admins have removed a previous entry for fear of legal problems.

  IIRC, the picture had an explicit sexual act, and it was not removed
for fear of *legal* problems (after all, putting porn in a website is not
illegal), but just because a certain degree of discretion is good.

-- 
#macro N(D)#if(D>99)cylinder{M()#local D=div(D,104);M().5,2pigment{rgb M()}}
N(D)#end#end#macro M()<mod(D,13)-6mod(div(D,13)8)-3,10>#end blob{
N(11117333955)N(4254934330)N(3900569407)N(7382340)N(3358)N(970)}//  - Warp -


Post a reply to this message

Goto Latest 10 Messages Next 8 Messages >>>

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.