 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Who here has the longest ***expected*** render time for their image,
this round? With my faithful old K6-233, I'm expecting ~15. Anyone
here going for more than 24hrs? More than 48?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Ben Chambers wrote:
>
> Who here has the longest ***expected*** render time for their image,
> this round? With my faithful old K6-233, I'm expecting ~15. Anyone
> here going for more than 24hrs? More than 48?
Mmm.... I am currently clocking at around 15 minutes with rad and
non-adaptive anti-aliasing for test renders. My pic still needs some
minor adjustments, but I am starting an adaptive anti-aliasing render
before I go to bed, just to in case 4 days isn't enough.
[Note to self: don't forget to add +C to command-line]
--
Francois Labreque | Rimmer: "Let's go to red alert!"
flabreque | Kryten: "Are you sure, Sir? You realize it
@ | actually means changing the bulb!"
videotron.ca
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Ben Chambers wrote:
>
> Who here has the longest ***expected*** render time for their image,
> this round? With my faithful old K6-233, I'm expecting ~15. Anyone
> here going for more than 24hrs? More than 48?
36 hours for my next stills entry, contrast, by measure. 14 3x3 area
lights for realism of the shadows. It is overkill for the scene but it
is quite realistic in this reality.
--
The reason there are Elvis sightings is that
there is a market for Elvis impersonators.
-- The Iron Webmaster, 230
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Well, I had a render running since last Thursday. It was about 65% this
morning and not very satisfactory, so I've killed it (groan).
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Ben Chambers wrote:
>
> Who here has the longest ***expected*** render time for their image,
> this round? With my faithful old K6-233, I'm expecting ~15. Anyone
> here going for more than 24hrs? More than 48?
I had a render that lasted for well over a month (running on a P-90
running Linux) some years back....
--
Jesse Becker -- jes### [at] picturevision com
Life is like a Microsoft product...you never what will go wrong next.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Ben Chambers <bdc### [at] hotmailcom> wrote:
> Who here has the longest ***expected*** render time for their image,
> this round? With my faithful old K6-233, I'm expecting ~15. Anyone
> here going for more than 24hrs? More than 48?
Well, my expected time was about 3 days, actual time, 1 day, 22 hours.
Whee.
Geoff
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
