 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
To me the description reads that he coloured the image in post-render using
a paint prog. - not a terrible violation, but it would mean that you should
ignore any colouring, textures, etc when scoring. However, I don't know
anything about lightwave and there may be an alternative reading of this.
DESCRIPTION OF HOW THIS IMAGE WAS CREATED:
thie primary models are created in LW, next I make a big render (2560x1920)
on which i can paint all the small details like roads, boats or trees.
On still images it`s faster paint directly the textures on the rendered
image.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Tom Melly wrote:
>
> To me the description reads that he coloured the image in post-render using
> a paint prog. - not a terrible violation, but it would mean that you should
> ignore any colouring, textures, etc when scoring. However, I don't know
> anything about lightwave and there may be an alternative reading of this.
>
> DESCRIPTION OF HOW THIS IMAGE WAS CREATED:
>
> thie primary models are created in LW, next I make a big render (2560x1920)
> on which i can paint all the small details like roads, boats or trees.
> On still images it`s faster paint directly the textures on the rendered
> image.
You left out an important bit of information, namely:
RENDERER USED:
Lightwave 5.5
TOOLS USED:
Photoshop 5.0
Hmmm.... by definition this is a clear violation of the post process
ruling.
--
Ken Tyler - 1400+ POV-Ray, Graphics, 3D Rendering, and Raytracing Links:
http://home.pacbell.net/tylereng/index.html http://www.povray.org/links/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Tom Melly
Subject: Re: Possible rule violation - seacity.jpg ?
Date: 5 May 2000 06:50:11
Message: <3912a763@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Ken" <tyl### [at] pacbell net> wrote in message
news:3912A5BC.AEFFBE09@pacbell.net...
> RENDERER USED:
> Lightwave 5.5
>
> TOOLS USED:
> Photoshop 5.0
>
Always hard to tell at what stage photoshop was used - could have been for
an image-map, etc. - shame really, it was quite a nice pic.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Tom Melly wrote:
> an image-map, etc. - shame really, it was quite a nice pic.
Would have been a lot nicer if he had bothered to detail the rest
of the city. It looks incomplete and unfinished.
--
Ken Tyler - 1400+ POV-Ray, Graphics, 3D Rendering, and Raytracing Links:
http://home.pacbell.net/tylereng/index.html http://www.povray.org/links/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
