"Trevor G Quayle" <Tin### [at] hotmailcom> wrote in message
> "St." <dot### [at] dotcom> wrote in message news:firstname.lastname@example.org...
>> LOL! Thank you for looking Mr. Lobster! :o)
> hehe, thanks, that's my little guy for Hallowe'en. Glad to see something
> is in the process of getting to be working.
One can only try...
> As for comments, it looks good so far (outside the colours, but I'm sure
> that will change) and the operation.
Thanks, and yes, and yes.
As I mentioned before, have a look at
> how CGSphere works for some ideas. One thing for voting, I do like the
> irtc concept of 3 voting categories vs just a single vote ranking.
Yes, I plan to change this as I like that system too, (and it's in
keeping with the IRTC). Each image could have three of those rating
drop-down fields beneath the image; one for Artistic Merit, one for
Technical Merit, and one for Concept and Originality - and all marks would
be out of 20, like the IRTC.
I think it
> gives more room for varying ideas and concepts (which the CGSphere forum
> lacks IMO)
I agree. And whilst I do like CGSphere, I also don't like them for not
having PoV-Ray on their list... <shrugs>
Post a reply to this message