"Mike Raiford" <mra### [at] hotmailcom> wrote in message
> St. wrote:
>> Thank you irtc admin. It was a long wait this time, but appreciated.
> Just my opinion, here... but, While the winner for technical merit is an
> excellent image, There's really not that much "technical merit" to the
> picture. All was modeled in Wings3D,
As was mine, and I placed 7th, and I am *well chuffed* with that! :)
Is there a problem with using a modelling prog for the IRTC instead of
CSG in PoV-Ray, Mike? After all, the IRTC is not PoV-Ray related. I thought
that this was a -general- raytracing comp. where any modelling prog and
raytracer would be exceptable regardless of the raytracing program used?
with exception of the feather,
> which was using a 3rd party tool. Not bad, but, not what I would call
> deserving of a technical merit award. Meh, these are judged by
> participants and a panel, so, that is what it is... hmm.
> Perhaps this was swapped accidentally with one of the place awards?
Well, all top six look correct to me... <shrug>
> Things! Billions of them!
Post a reply to this message