 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Paolo Gibellini wrote:
> I think that the most of the data could be retrieved from personal
> copies of the users. My current thinking is that we should look to rely
> on some existing platform adapting it to *rtc needs.
I was just looking at wordpress and gallery plugins because I
consider adding a blog to my webpage, and out of the box it would
seem to be possible to simply create an "album" for a specific
topic or contest, and all registered users can upload images,
comment on other images and rate them on a 1-5 star system.
(this was the "wordpress photo album plus" plugin).
Of course there is no automatic system to limit the dates of
a contest or determine winners.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Christian Froeschlin wrote:
actually there even seems to be a contest plugin although
it has not been maintained in a while
http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/wp-photocontest/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Stephen <mca### [at] aol com> wrote:
> On 25/03/2013 8:24 AM, Thomas de Groot wrote:
> >>
> >> BTW: Do you have access to the data generated by the contests?
> >> It sounds like the site is very much hanging on the goodwill of
> >> an unknown entity and it would be too bad if all the images
> >> will be lost at some point in the future without backup.
> >
> > Not sure. The data may disappear, but so did most of the IRTC data, or
> > am I wrong there? That data seems to be only partially available nowadays.
>
> To add to Thomas's answer. All members can access all images through the
> Archives. But I have know idea if anyone has actually downloaded them. A
> big job doing then one at a time.
Sorry, was knocked out by the flu some days...
What should I say to this. Yes, I'm guilty, I've have done it (not one at a
time), but only the images and the animations themselves (storing the authors
and main statistics as well) but not the comments by the authors or the voters.
But I'm working on it...
Most of the IRTC data are still available only the second period is lost. All
entries from the beginning till the hiatus 2006 are still available (ftp-link at
www.irtc.org).
>
> I also thought that if we can talk the developer into converting the
> animation section into another stills one. We could run two concurrent
> challenges with different run times.
>
This may prove a problem since he even forgot the invoices you told.
Best regards,
Michael
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 26/03/2013 8:20 PM, MichaelJF wrote:
>> >I also thought that if we can talk the developer into converting the
>> >animation section into another stills one. We could run two concurrent
>> >challenges with different run times.
>> >
> This may prove a problem since he even forgot the invoices you told.
No, I don't think so. It is quite a small amount.
Glad, your over your flu. I had it at the beginning of the year, not nice.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 26-3-2013 21:20, MichaelJF wrote:
> Sorry, was knocked out by the flu some days...
Nasty thing. Hope you are better now.
>
> Most of the IRTC data are still available only the second period is lost. All
> entries from the beginning till the hiatus 2006 are still available (ftp-link at
> www.irtc.org).
I stand corrected. I overlooked the ftp link. Typical blindness hiding
lines below the ones I am looking at in the first place ;-)
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>Christian Froeschlin on date 26/03/2013 14.28 wrote:
> actually there even seems to be a contest plugin although
> it has not been maintained in a while
>
> http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/wp-photocontest/
>
It could be a starting point.
It seems that the major difficult to maintain irtc (old and new) and
tc-rtc sites is in the lack of time of the members of the POV-community.
I like custom solution, but without time to develop them I'd prefer to
use a mature existing system (like WordPress and the plugin you suggest).
;-)
Paolo
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Paolo Gibellini wrote:
> >Christian Froeschlin on date 26/03/2013 14.28 wrote:
>> actually there even seems to be a contest plugin although
>> it has not been maintained in a while
>>
>> http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/wp-photocontest/
>>
> It could be a starting point.
> It seems that the major difficult to maintain irtc (old and new) and
> tc-rtc sites is in the lack of time of the members of the POV-community.
> I like custom solution, but without time to develop them I'd prefer to
> use a mature existing system (like WordPress and the plugin you suggest).
> ;-)
> Paolo
>
If you want, I can resurrect the data for the most recent IRTC run and
provide titles, descriptions, authors, comments and links to images for
all the entries in all the contests. With a small amount of effort I can
export it in XML format.
David Buck
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>David Buck on date 06/05/2013 2.51 wrote:
> If you want, I can resurrect the data for the most recent IRTC run and
> provide titles, descriptions, authors, comments and links to images for
> all the entries in all the contests. With a small amount of effort I can
> export it in XML format.
>
> David Buck
Thank you, David!
As said, I think that IRTC & TC-RTC's history is valuable for people
interested into raytracing.
At the moment I'm very busy in real life, but this summer I wish I could
explore the capabilities of Wordpress (or something similar) and ask for
pov-users opinions.
A dump of latest IRTC entries will be surely useful.
;-)
Paolo
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"MichaelJF" <mi-### [at] t-onlinede> wrote:
> I think the time of ray tracing contests is gone now. <snip>
> I propose that this is the last round of the TINA CheP
> contest.
rounds after that, but have not participated since. If it helps, here are the
reasons why:
my account was lost altogether) for the user name Shay. Yes, I can get a new
account with another name, but I would prefer my old account associated with my
would certainly have commented, if not entered a time or two, if my account had
been accessible.
2. Small audience. Producing something for a small audience of like-minded
feedback.
media to look at. Consideration of any one item is almost unwarranted.
/how/ to finish an image. Many of the interminable WIPs I see are modeled with
techniques that will grind progress to a near-halt long before an image can be
completed.
5. The quality on a lot of the images is terrible. This might be related to the
slow death of the POV-Ray newsgroups, but things that used to be a matter of
course (decent sky, metal textures, radiosity) are missing from many of the
foremost, your image should convey that you give a shit.
******** Suggestions:
2. Give more constructive feedback to all of the entries. Encourage people to
3. Encourage everyone to back off the bad copies of professional work and
explore still life, abstract, surrealism, architecture and other genres more
4. Go back to the book titles. The tc-rtc survives, if barely. The irtc does
6. Post actual WIPs (emphasis on the P) in P.B.I to encourage anyone there to
come take a look at the tc-rtc.
7. Find my password.
-Shay
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 20/05/2013 4:08 PM, Shay wrote:
>
> rounds after that, but have not participated since. If it helps, here are the
> reasons why:
>
> my account was lost altogether) for the user name Shay. Yes, I can get a new
> account with another name, but I would prefer my old account associated with my
> original entry and comments.
I have sent you an individual newsletter asking you to get in touch with
me so that I can reset your password and give you a new one.
> would certainly have commented, if not entered a time or two, if my account had
> been accessible.
>
You are right. Neither Thomas nor I get the "contact us" mails.
> 2. Small audience. Producing something for a small audience of like-minded
> feedback.
>
Me too. No one likes what I do but do I care? ;-)
> media to look at. Consideration of any one item is almost unwarranted.
>
This is very true and I've given up commenting on the TC-RTC myself.
> /how/ to finish an image.
You might be talking about me. :-)
> Many of the interminable WIPs I see are modeled with
> techniques that will grind progress to a near-halt long before an image can be
> completed.
>
> 5. The quality on a lot of the images is terrible. This might be related to the
> slow death of the POV-Ray newsgroups, but things that used to be a matter of
> course (decent sky, metal textures, radiosity) are missing from many of the
> foremost, your image should convey that you give a shit.
>
> ******** Suggestions:
>
>
I feel that a lot of people do not like to post WIPs for a competition
in case their ideas are stolen or they "claim" the subject.
As for "not suitable at work" that should not be a problem unless you
live in the bible belt. We do not want porn but we are adults and IMO
sexy is not the same as dirty.
> 2. Give more constructive feedback to all of the entries. Encourage people to
>
I wish that I could force people to do that.
> 3. Encourage everyone to back off the bad copies of professional work and
> explore still life, abstract, surrealism, architecture and other genres more
>
Ooo! Caty. ;-)
I don't agree with that. Just look at Thomas's entry for "History and
Practice of the Art of Photography" March 2011
http://www.tc-rtc.co.uk/member/imagenewdisplay/index325.html
Anyway I would rather have someone's genuine attempt at reproducing art,
badly, than no entries.
> 4. Go back to the book titles. The tc-rtc survives, if barely. The irtc does
Under discussion. Please join in.
>
>
> 6. Post actual WIPs (emphasis on the P) in P.B.I to encourage anyone there to
> come take a look at the tc-rtc.
>
> 7. Find my password.
Phew! At least I can do the last one.
Your comments and suggestions are good.
One of the big problems that we have is that we now have no control over
the site development. It is frozen the way it is. :-(
But as we speak Thomas and I are discussing an alternative.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
