|  |  | 
|  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | 
|  |  | 
|  |  | 
| From: Thomas de Groot Subject: TC-RTC: Results for the February 2015 Challenge 2: Bubble
 Date:  1 Mar 2015 03:54:18
 Message: <54f2d3ba$1@news.povray.org>
 
 |  |  | 
|  |  | 
|  |  | 
|  |  | The final results for the Challenge 2 are as follow. Note that one 
participant (Lequenne) did not vote and so lost points:
1 JuuG          Fire Burn, Cauldron Bubble  267
2 DrNo          Speculative                 265
3 SeanDay       honeypot ant                247
4 Lequenne      Valentines bubble           237
-- 
Thomas
 Post a reply to this message
 |  | 
|  |  | 
|  |  | 
|  |  | 
| From: Le Forgeron Subject: Re: TC-RTC: Results for the February 2015 Challenge 2: Bubble
 Date:  1 Mar 2015 04:16:09
 Message: <54f2d8d9$1@news.povray.org>
 
 |  |  | 
|  |  | 
|  |  | 
|  |  | Le 01/03/2015 09:54, Thomas de Groot a écrit :
> The final results for the Challenge 2 are as follow. Note that one
> participant (Lequenne) did not vote and so lost points:
> 
> 1 JuuG          Fire Burn, Cauldron Bubble  267
> 2 DrNo          Speculative                 265
> 3 SeanDay       honeypot ant                247
> 4 Lequenne      Valentines bubble           237
> 
I would like to have a bit of link with each TC-RTC publication... so
far it looks like a site well-known by the ones who know it, but not for
the newcomers... just a small url to the home page would ease the easy
reading.
And if the site could be in sync with the publication (so far the result
for challenge 2 gives 60 points less for the voters, hence a different
order)
 Post a reply to this message
 |  | 
|  |  | 
|  |  | 
|  |  | 
| From: Stephen Subject: Re: TC-RTC: Results for the February 2015 Challenge 2: Bubble
 Date:  1 Mar 2015 04:42:35
 Message: <54f2df0b@news.povray.org>
 
 |  |  | 
|  |  | 
|  |  | 
|  |  | On 01/03/2015 09:16, Le_Forgeron wrote:
> Le 01/03/2015 09:54, Thomas de Groot a écrit :
>> The final results for the Challenge 2 are as follow. Note that one
>> participant (Lequenne) did not vote and so lost points:
>>
>> 1 JuuG          Fire Burn, Cauldron Bubble  267
>> 2 DrNo          Speculative                 265
>> 3 SeanDay       honeypot ant                247
>> 4 Lequenne      Valentines bubble           237
>>
>
> I would like to have a bit of link with each TC-RTC publication... so
> far it looks like a site well-known by the ones who know it, but not for
> the newcomers... just a small url to the home page would ease the easy
> reading.
>
Are you talking about the newsletter?
If so that is easily done. We have not thought that it was important to 
include a link. As the newsletter only goes out to members.
> And if the site could be in sync with the publication (so far the result
> for challenge 2 gives 60 points less for the voters, hence a different
> order)
>
Nice catch. We missed that.
I will get onto it.
-- 
Regards
     Stephen
Post a reply to this message
 |  | 
|  |  | 
|  |  | 
|  |  | 
| From: Le Forgeron Subject: Re: TC-RTC: Results for the February 2015 Challenge 2: Bubble
 Date:  1 Mar 2015 05:13:44
 Message: <54f2e658$1@news.povray.org>
 
 |  |  | 
|  |  | 
|  |  | 
|  |  | Le 01/03/2015 10:42, Stephen a écrit :
> On 01/03/2015 09:16, Le_Forgeron wrote:
>> Le 01/03/2015 09:54, Thomas de Groot a écrit :
>>> The final results for the Challenge 2 are as follow. Note that one
>>> participant (Lequenne) did not vote and so lost points:
>>>
>>> 1 JuuG          Fire Burn, Cauldron Bubble  267
>>> 2 DrNo          Speculative                 265
>>> 3 SeanDay       honeypot ant                247
>>> 4 Lequenne      Valentines bubble           237
>>>
>>
>> I would like to have a bit of link with each TC-RTC publication... so
>> far it looks like a site well-known by the ones who know it, but not for
>> the newcomers... just a small url to the home page would ease the easy
>> reading.
>>
> 
> Are you talking about the newsletter?
> If so that is easily done. We have not thought that it was important to
> include a link. As the newsletter only goes out to members.
> 
I'm talking about the quoted text, in this thread.
>> And if the site could be in sync with the publication (so far the result
>> for challenge 2 gives 60 points less for the voters, hence a different
>> order)
>>
> 
> Nice catch. We missed that.
> I will get onto it.
>
 Post a reply to this message
 |  | 
|  |  | 
|  |  | 
|  |  | 
| From: Stephen Subject: Re: TC-RTC: Results for the February 2015 Challenge 2: Bubble
 Date:  1 Mar 2015 05:36:28
 Message: <54f2ebac$1@news.povray.org>
 
 |  |  | 
|  |  | 
|  |  | 
|  |  | On 01/03/2015 10:13, Le_Forgeron wrote:
>> Are you talking about the newsletter?
>> >If so that is easily done. We have not thought that it was important to
>> >include a link. As the newsletter only goes out to members.
>> >
> I'm talking about the quoted text, in this thread.
>
Ah! I have a one track mind. :-)
We will try to remember.
Thanks.
http://www.tc-rtc.co.uk/index/index.html
-- 
Regards
     Stephen
Post a reply to this message
 |  | 
|  |  | 
|  |  | 
|  |  | 
| From: Thomas de Groot Subject: Re: TC-RTC: Results for the February 2015 Challenge 2: Bubble
 Date:  1 Mar 2015 07:05:26
 Message: <54f30086@news.povray.org>
 
 |  |  | 
|  |  | 
|  |  | 
|  |  | On 1-3-2015 11:36, Stephen wrote:
> On 01/03/2015 10:13, Le_Forgeron wrote:
>>> Are you talking about the newsletter?
>>> >If so that is easily done. We have not thought that it was important to
>>> >include a link. As the newsletter only goes out to members.
>>> >
>> I'm talking about the quoted text, in this thread.
>>
>
>
> Ah! I have a one track mind. :-)
>
> We will try to remember.
>
> Thanks.
>
> http://www.tc-rtc.co.uk/index/index.html
>
>
I indeed forgot to add the link this time :-(
-- 
Thomas
 Post a reply to this message
 |  | 
|  |  | 
|  |  | 
|  |  | 
| From: Stephen Subject: Re: TC-RTC: Results for the February 2015 Challenge 2: Bubble
 Date: 16 Apr 2015 12:45:41
 Message: <552fe735$1@news.povray.org>
 
 |  |  | 
|  |  | 
|  |  | 
|  |  | On 01/03/2015 10:13, Le_Forgeron wrote:
>>> >>And if the site could be in sync with the publication (so far the result
>>> >>for challenge 2 gives 60 points less for the voters, hence a different
>>> >>order)
>>> >>
>> >
>> >Nice catch. We missed that.
>> >I will get onto it.
>> >
Would you like to check that this has been fixed?
-- 
Regards
     Stephen
Post a reply to this message
 |  | 
|  |  | 
|  |  | 
|  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |