In article <3EF### [at] informatikuni-freiburgde>,
Mark Weyer <wey### [at] informatikuni-freiburgde> wrote:
> So, I would be happy for any option (I agree it should not be the
> default) that trades memory usage for time usage in a reasonable way.
Remember I mentioned it would make the code more complex? Making it
optional won't help, it makes the problem more than twice as bad. I
think there are better ways to solve the problem.
--
Christopher James Huff <cja### [at] earthlinknet>
http://home.earthlink.net/~cjameshuff/
POV-Ray TAG: chr### [at] tagpovrayorg
http://tag.povray.org/
Post a reply to this message
|