|
 |
In article <391f2357@news.povray.org>, "Rune" <rune.johansen [at] iname com>
wrote:
> Yes. I thought of that. Maybe it's best that way. I just hope not too
> many people will make logos with "official" colors if the colors are
> not a very important part of the logo. Take Tony's eye logo for
> example. I think it looks nice in colors, but I don't think the
> specific colors of the logo are very important.
And then there is my "3 spheres" logo, which pretty much requires the
red/green/blue colors(the text colors are less important, but they were
also chosen for a reason).
> But maybe for those logos where the colors are *really* an important
> part of the logo we should have this format. In that case I would say
> that we should restrict the amount of colors. Say like, "no color
> gradients, only plain colors, and not too many". A couple of colors
> would be normal while something like 8 different colors would be an
> absolute maximum. What do you think of this?
I don't think this should be a requirement, although it might be a
recommendation in the rules. I can't really think of a good reason to do
this.
> Anyway, if we add this optional large color format, I think we could
> have a 32x32 color format too. That way we can see how the official
> colors look in a small resolution.
Good idea.
> That's what I though one could use one of the custom formats for. Do
> you really think more than 120x120 pixels are required just to show
> the logo in a fancy way? I would like to hear what you think, maybe
> we really should add a larger format too... But I must also think of
> bandwidth... Hmm...
Actually, what I was thinking of was allowing one of the 3 "fancy" or
"custom" versions to be a larger size. 120*120 isn't that big on many
monitors, and many of the smaller details on the fancy versions could be
lost...an upper limit should be set, of course, maybe 300*300.
--
Christopher James Huff - Personal e-mail: chrishuff_99 [at] yahoo com
TAG(Technical Assistance Group) e-mail: chris.huff [at] tag povray org
Personal Web page: http://chrishuff.dhs.org/
TAG Web page: http://tag.povray.org/
Post a reply to this message
|
 |