In article <391ec750@news.povray.org>, "Rune" <run### [at] inamecom> 
wrote:

> A 32x32 pixel black and white version. Shades of gray is allowed, but 
> only for anti-aliasing. For the reason of keeping the sizes small I 
> think 16 shades of gray is enough.

This sounds good.


> A 14400 pixel black and white version. This version must contain 
> 14400 pixels at most, but the logo-designers can decide for 
> themselves if they want a 60x240, or 80x180, or 120x120 resolution, 
> or something completely else. This is so no shapes of logos are 
> favored. Shades of gray is allowed in the same way as in the previous 
> version.

Why 14400? I personally would prefer 19200, so you could have 160*120.


> So, these 5 formats are my suggestion. What do you think of it?

I would suggest an optional 6th version, a "plain" color version. Some 
logos have color schemes which are part of the logo, the Apple logo is 
an example. It has a black and white version, but color versions always 
have the same "official" color scheme, a rainbow of colors from 
top(green) to bottom(blue) with yellow, red, and purple in the middle.
And maybe a larger resolution "fancy" version, like a splash screen. Not 
necessarily the logo, but an image using it.

-- 
Christopher James Huff - Personal e-mail: chr### [at] yahoocom
TAG(Technical Assistance Group) e-mail: chr### [at] tagpovrayorg
Personal Web page: http://chrishuff.dhs.org/
TAG Web page: http://tag.povray.org/

Post a reply to this message