|
 |
On 13/9/2024 11:45, Bald Eagle wrote:
> Saul Luizaga <sau### [at] gmail com> wrote:
>> On 8/9/2024 08:05, tTh wrote:
>>> On 9/7/24 18:57, ingo wrote:
>
>>>> We communicate nearly as slow as we render, so no need for real time
>>>> chat.
>
> Usually true - unless there's something under development by 2 or more people.
> Then the posting to forum method is annoyingly slow.
>
>> That nobody uses, IRC is ancient rustic and nobody cares for it; if you
>> less attention from the Internet, keep ignoring current trends
>
> Project management software has been suggested before, and would facilitate
> working on small group or POV-Ray 4.0 development, in the instances where people
> needed to iterate with realtime feedback while they had the opportunity, lest it
> expire and real life once again took priority.
>
>
https://news.povray.org/povray.pov4.discussion.general/message/%3Cweb.66807cdd4bc5dc751f9dae3025979125%40news.povray.or
> g%3E/#%3Cweb.66807cdd4bc5dc751f9dae3025979125%40news.povray.org%3E
>
> It would be great if the chat logs could be saved and archived, so that the
> development, debugging, and solution(s) would be available to the community
> afterwards. I'd hate to lose that aspect of the forum posts.
>
> - BW
>
People just opposed like morons: hey bunch of, what part of
irrelevant/casual chat you didn't get? my post clearly states that; it
attracts people, it's like a online FAQ and might get more people
involved in every capacity: users and devs. of it, which is what this
project needs to stay alive.
If you ignore the message and just justify a negative 'coz it's the sum
of all your fears, it is in fact, still a dumbass answer get it? Noen of
you gave a valid justification, just "No" 'coz you want to touch my whee
whee or something equally stupid
Post a reply to this message
|
|
