On 5/6/21 7:37 AM, Ash Holsenback wrote:
> On 5/6/21 7:35 AM, William F Pokorny wrote:
>> I second your thought not enough detail about the caching got into the 
>> documentation. At least, I've never run across it - those beta change 
>> notes are there, but that is not where most will look for 
>> documentation of the output file caching.
> 
> i do not... y'all were just looking in the wrong place
> 

Perhaps we do disagree. :-) I was aware of the documentation to which 
you pointed us.

I believe our documentation would be better if somewhere it included 
everything in those beta release notes about output file caching - after 
the first paragraph. Those realease notes are well written and clear 
with several useful tips. I believe our documentation today describes 
switches with not enough about implications and use - information in 
those release to release notes.

(And yes, I meant jr where I wrote Ingo...)

Bill P.

Post a reply to this message