On 5/8/20 9:56 PM, Bald Eagle wrote:
> 
>>> I'll also have to think about encoding a vector into a function so that the
>>> pattern {function{}} thing evaluates to the same VECTOR result everywhere - thus
>>> you could define a function intead of a vector and then use the dot notation in
>>> a function, whereas you currently can't use Vector.x in a function expression.
>>
>> Interesting idea... I'll let it bang around in my head.
> 
> Kinda sorta works.
> I only played around with it enough to get basic functionality.
> Still some weird / awkward things about it all.
> 

Thanks. Grabbed a copy of your code last night for future reference/play.

Bill P.

Post a reply to this message