POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.binaries.images : assumed_gamma discussion : Re: assumed_gamma discussion Server Time
25 Apr 2024 13:01:35 EDT (-0400)
  Re: assumed_gamma discussion  
From: Alain Martel
Date: 11 Nov 2019 19:29:00
Message: <5dc9fccc$1@news.povray.org>

> On 11/8/19 1:45 PM, Norbert Kern wrote:
> 
>> I know all the arguments for gamma 1.0 - but I like the sharper 
>> contrasts coming
>> with gamma 2.2.
> 

> 1.0, but it was really dark and I needed to add a lot more lights and I 
> wasn't feeling like adding a lot more lights. So I added *some* lights, 
> and settled at gamma 1.7.
> I think it gives it more of an animation look and less of a realistic 
> look, which I'm kind of going for.
> 
> 
Don't add more light, but make them brighter.


Post a reply to this message

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.