On 11/8/19 1:45 PM, Norbert Kern wrote:

> I know all the arguments for gamma 1.0 - but I like the sharper contrasts coming
> with gamma 2.2.

My movie is gamma  1.7.  I started at 2.2.  After the arguments, I tried 
1.0, but it was really dark and I needed to add a lot more lights and I 
wasn't feeling like adding a lot more lights. So I added *some* lights, 
and settled at gamma 1.7.
I think it gives it more of an animation look and less of a realistic 
look, which I'm kind of going for.


-- 
dik
Rendered 22,919,500,800 of 40,928,716,800 pixels (55%)

Post a reply to this message