Am 17.01.2019 um 15:05 schrieb William F Pokorny:

>> - Performance has degraded a bit, but I'm willing to accept this for 
>> the sake of extended functionality and easier maintenance.
>>
> 
> Hmm, I'm surprised some by this. Are your test character strings really 
> short? In the existing text shape code all the characters ended up more 
> or less as one huge glyph as you know. As the string to the text shape 
> got large, performance slowed substantially.

Actually, wading through the old code for unrelated reasons, I just 
noticed that this isn't true: The old `text` primitive has actually been 
a CSG union all along, with one child per character.

Post a reply to this message