|
|
On 10/02/2018 08:34 PM, Kenneth wrote:
> Long ago, I originally thought that a free-falling object needed all three
> rotations to look natural. The idea seemed logical-- but the visual result
> didn't bear that out (to my eyes, anyway.) I guess I could do a thorough
> analysis of the applied 'vector forces' that cause an object to rotate in the
> first place -- but that's a lot of work ;-) For now, I'm curious as to which
> scheme you prefer, from a purely visual standpoint.
>
My caboose landing is a 2 axis rotation. I'm not sure why I didn't even
try 3, that would have made sense.
Your 3 axis, it looks like sometimes it changes direction while falling.
--
dik
Rendered 1024 of 921600 pixels (0%)
Post a reply to this message
|
|