|
|
On 14-2-2017 23:17, Stephen wrote:
> On 2/14/2017 9:48 PM, Kirk Andrews wrote:
>>> Isn't that what water does in RL?
>>> It looks good.
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Stephen
>>
>> Well, I suppose to really get it down we'd probably want to factor in
>> some
>> inertia.
>>
>
> No, to get the water down you just need gravity. :-)
> Seriously, Would you intend to make close ups or an animation? These
> landscapes are generally quite static over short time spans. (I am sure
> Thomas might have an opinion.)
>
Oh, I do! I do! This is coming at a time when I have been wondering how
to fill those valleys with streams. Lately, I have been working with a
combination and alternation of Wilbur, Bryce, Terrabrush, GeoControl,
and World Machine on the same height_field, to generate landscapes where
river valleys are eroded down. Problem is the water and I have not got
that far indeed. So, I am quite interested in this development. It is
looking very good!
> It actually gives me an impression of the Scottish Highlands with
> interconnected lochs. It can't be because the sun is shining and it
> doesn't look cold. ;-)
> I like the pattern of vegetation as well.
> How long did it take to parse and render?
>
>
--
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|