On 12/31/2013 08:00 AM, Le_Forgeron wrote:
> Le 31/12/2013 12:50, James Holsenback nous fit lire :
>> Just noticed that progress reporting seems to be different with uber-dev
>> branch ... talking about the rendered xxx of xxxx (xx%) message.
>>
>> The % indication /used/ to reset to 0 at the end of each pretrace step,
>> before starting the next step. Now it appears that it doesn't reset to 0
>> until it starts the final trace.
>>
>> Other than "preliminary workaround for FS#313" (dated Dec 15th) I didn't
>> see anything in the commits listing ... could that be what I'm seeing?
>
> That's not 6092 of perforce: only change is commenting assert().
>
> Which branch of uber-dev ? (I assume UperPov, branch develop, isn't it ?)

you are correct ... sorry for short-hand reference

>
> I was to investigate that counter(s?) one day, as continuing (+C) a
> render so far, on unix: does not display the pixels stored in
> pov-state.file and the number of render pixels is ok for the current
> session, yet the total number is picture dimension (ignoring the already
> rendered pixels)... and I would like to see some pps or ppm (both from
> beginning and recent average) in addition to the number of pixels during
> the progression. But that's a bit off-topic.
>
> Just have to find where it is... But no time on the 31th December.

yes ... it's about time I get up from the computer as well. Need to 
prepare for guests this evening. Happy New Year!

>
> In the meantime, you can use "git bisect" to find the actual change.
>

Oh thanks for the git "nugget"

Jim

Post a reply to this message