On 11/26/2013 12:16 PM, James Holsenback wrote:
> On 11/26/2013 11:32 AM, clipka wrote:
>> Am 26.11.2013 16:50, schrieb James Holsenback:
>>> On 11/26/2013 07:42 AM, clipka wrote:
>>>> Am 26.11.2013 04:33, schrieb James Holsenback:
>>>>
>>>>>> This must be something deep in the bowels of the POVMS
>>>>>> message-passing
>>>>>> code; can you try the following - in source/base/povmscpp.cpp,
>>>>>> replace
>>>>>> all
>>>>>>
>>>>>>      throw POV_EXCEPTION_CODE(pov_base::kFileDataErr)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> with
>>>>>>
>>>>>>      throw POV_EXCEPTION_CODE(pov_base::kFileDataErr, "FUBAR: ###")
>>>>>
>>>>> error: macro "POV_EXCEPTION_CODE" passed 2 arguments, but takes just 1
>>>>
>>>> My bad - that should have been:
>>>>
>>>>      throw POV_EXCEPTION(pov_base::kFileDataErr, "FUBAR: ###")
>>>>
>>>
>>> This run got a little farther .... used +am3 aa depth +r5
>>>
>>> Rendered 553984 of 705600 pixels (78%)
>>> Belch: 1494
>>
>> Still doesn't make much sense to me. Mind e-mailing the complete scene +
>> all render settings? (See the dev newsgroup for my e-mail address).
>>
>
> a little bit too big to email ~15MB, so I put it on my wiki testbed ...
> see your email for the link

another thought ... might be worth it to have a quick look at latest 
Coverity scan results. I've not looked so your mileage may vary

Post a reply to this message