On 05/17/2013 11:59 AM, Stephen wrote:
> On 17/05/2013 4:33 PM, James Holsenback wrote:
>> well i think this is partially due to the reference section
>> reorganization ... also <indexentry> tags that weren't in the proper
>> place since whenever. previously with the more linear lay-out the
>> <indexentry> the tag could appear in the section just before the /real/
>> landing place so you wouldn't have to scroll up slightly to be at the
>> beginning of the target section. the re-org was done hastily in that
>> when the section was moved, care wasn't taken to make sure that the tag
>> was also moved. having said all that i /have/ fixed those problems as
>> i've came across them, but have postponed the herculean task to ferret
>> out /all/ of the problematic tags
>
> This has been bugging me for years so it is not new.
> Would you like me to compile a list of what I can find and either post
> them here or send them to you?
>

We could probably gain a little more traction if I was to let you (and 
anyone else who wants to) go after those as you find them. I'd be 
willing to coach you up on the process that I've used in the past.

Post a reply to this message