"ingo" <ing### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote in message 
news:Xns9BA0BEDAE2238seed7@news.povray.org...
> in news:497b54bc@news.povray.org Jim Holsenback wrote:
>
>> I was talking about the missing sum and prod symbols (II and E) ....
>> any ideas about that?
>>
>>
>
> Iirc, I made these two images with a formula editor (open office?) before
> the latex stuff was introduced.
>
>
> ingo

Ingo,

Thanks for the reply .... well then it looks like I'm good to go as far as 
how the wiki renders the formula (minus II and E symbols). Maybe that also 
explains why the formula is somewhat different as well. I'm going to go with 
what I have now with a follow up later. All the other formulas look OK .... 
I can live with two near misses for now.

Jim

Post a reply to this message